Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 871
K
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
K
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 871
Here's another interesting link...

60 minutes busted

I could only pull this up in IE.




Keith W 98.5 SE Sport ATX Lt. Denim Blue Other car '02 3.0 Duratec Taurus wagon Want some real political discussions? Try www.freeconservatives.com
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Here is a good one on the CBS fake news story: (This is a blog, so the story may not be on top forever).

Turns out one of the guys who "authenticated" these documents did so without even seeing them, and has since said that they are fake. Way to go, Danny Boy.

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 772
D
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
D
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 772


former owner, 95 SE MTX 02 Ford Explorer
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 871
K
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
K
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 871
Blogs, the NEW press revolution. I haven't posted on any so far but here is a good forum www.freeconservatives.com


Keith W 98.5 SE Sport ATX Lt. Denim Blue Other car '02 3.0 Duratec Taurus wagon Want some real political discussions? Try www.freeconservatives.com
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 871
K
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
K
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 871
"For what avail the plow or sail or land or life if freedom fail."


Keith W 98.5 SE Sport ATX Lt. Denim Blue Other car '02 3.0 Duratec Taurus wagon Want some real political discussions? Try www.freeconservatives.com
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,469
D
Hard-core CEG\'er
OP Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
D
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,469
THIS is getting better by the day!!

DAN RATHER is staying with the sinking ship..steadfastly clinging to his fraudulant story..

YES, we have had NUMEROUS type and handwriting guys (every single one except the CBS experts) tell us the type and signatures are fake..

AND the authors wife & son say the memo is fake

AND the senior guard officer mentioned in the memo as putting pressure on the author "to sugarcoat Bush's record" had retired from guard 18 mo earlier..

AND the "ACE in the hole" that Rathew fell back to after the story began to unravel, General Hodges...says he was never shown the memo and now having seen it says it was fake...

ALSO, we we now have the daughter of this Barns character, the Texas democrat that supposedly pulled strings to get Bush in the guard..basically saying he is lying, told her the opposite in 2000 and is a major Kerry fund raiser AND is writing a book featuring the Bush BS..

PLUS...we now hear that this/next week a major new Kerry campaign commercial is (was?) to be released attacking Bush's guard service again using some of the CBS/Barns stuff (of course, nobody would IMPLY that CBS was not working with the Kerry campiagn..its all just coincidence given Rather's completely unbiased track record)...Anyway..looks like back to the drawing board for that little Kerry "positive message"..

TO END on a brighter note for Kerry, I heard today on the radio that Kerry recieved the endorsement of the communist party!


1999 Amazon Green SVT Contour (#554/2760) "People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." -Soren Kierkegaard (as posted by Jato)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
We have a standard example of liberal media bias shown in their double standard of handling the Swift Boat Vet stories and the Bush guard service story. (Aside from the fact that they used fake documents to create a story), the network and print media immediately tried to discredit the Swift Boat Vets because they found 6 degrees of separation between Republicans and the Swift Boat Vets. But here you have an actual political party attacking Bush's guard service. If the Democrats were so offended by the SBV attack on Kerry, how can they justify attacking Bush's record with fake memos and shady implications? Or, downright lies?

EDIT: I forgot to mention, the liberal bias in the "service attack" stories is that the Democrats get a free pass in attacking Bush's record, but the media finds that a chief donor for the SBV happens to be Republican and suddenly 264 vets are lying.

Last edited by Davo; 09/13/04 04:39 PM.
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Here's more:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ideas_opinions/story/231413p-198727c.html

I don't really like O'Reilly, but he does have a point here.

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,667
M
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
M
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,667
Originally posted by Davo:
We have a standard example of liberal media bias




Here's yet another...

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/12/business/yourmoney/12view.html?th

Key points, highlighted below

Originally posted by NYTimes:

They found that Mr. Clinton received better headlines than the two Republican presidents. Even after adjusting the data to compensate for differences in economic performance under the three presidents, the Republicans received 20 to 30 percent fewer positive headlines, on average, for the same type of news, they concluded.

For instance, they said, the unemployment rate in the Clinton administration averaged 5.2 percent, only three-tenths of a percentage point less than it has under George W. Bush. But while 44 percent of Mr. Clinton's headlines on unemployment were positive, only 23 percent of President Bush's headlines on the subject have been upbeat.

They found that as a group, the nation's 10 largest newspapers and The Associated Press were even more skewed. According to the researchers, this group gave Republican administrations 20 to 40 percent fewer positive headlines than those given to Mr. Clinton, on average. Among the top 10 newspapers, they said that all except The Houston Chronicle had a pro-Democratic leaning, though the margin for error in their calculations was too large to be meaningful for most of them individually.






Diesel owns you
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,489
B
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
B
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,489
it looks like the conservative klan is has gotten their panties in a bunch over this story.

everyone knows that bush was one of the thousands of privileged kids who were able to avoid combat by serving in the national guard. the only reason some people make note of it is because of the causualties by proportion..."although draftees made up only 16 percent of the U.S. armed forces, they were the bulk of infantry riflemen and accounted for more than half the army's battle deaths." source

you can tell when the bush babies need their diaper changed because you guys whine about everything someone says bad about bush. who gives a kcuf! lol! at this point most people just want the election to be over with so ya'll can go back to hating for any/every other reason besides if you like bush/kerry.


'03 Saab 9-5 Aero
Page 4 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5