We have a standard example of liberal media bias shown in their double standard of handling the Swift Boat Vet stories and the Bush guard service story. (Aside from the fact that they used fake documents to create a story), the network and print media immediately tried to discredit the Swift Boat Vets because they found 6 degrees of separation between Republicans and the Swift Boat Vets. But here you have an actual political party attacking Bush's guard service. If the Democrats were so offended by the SBV attack on Kerry, how can they justify attacking Bush's record with fake memos and shady implications? Or, downright lies?
EDIT: I forgot to mention, the liberal bias in the "service attack" stories is that the Democrats get a free pass in attacking Bush's record, but the media finds that a chief donor for the SBV happens to be Republican and suddenly 264 vets are lying.
Last edited by Davo; 09/13/04 04:39 PM.
