Bush is FOCUSED/plans on winning the war...again, peace is possibly "won" after that..secondary (but important).
9/11...read what I said. I was not refering to who planned 9/11, I was pointing out that as a result of a failed, incomplete Iraq intervention in 1991 we may have missed a chance to plant a democratic notion in "the heart of the beast" that may have SPREAD to areas that WERE involved a decade later in 9/11 planning. It is my FAITH in a representative gonvernment and the freedom it brings, of capitalism and the prosperity it brings, that leads me to the conclusion that it WILL ultimately succeed even in the middle east. Not exclusive at all with the muslim religion...just a different flavor.
If you have no such faith, you will not believe this workable..
We can thanks Dubyas dad...for bowing to the damn UN, as Kerry wants to do now. It was not his dad's idea to hold back..
Right about bombing Japan....win the war THEN win the peace..my point exactly.
I have picked a side....plan to win the war. Win the war to win the peace. Whereas..plan to win the peace = failure. Perhaps I was unclear...are you not getting the distinction??
