Originally posted by Kirill:
Originally posted by todras:
Originally posted by Kirill:

Mazda 6 - Nice but heavy. No secondaries




Most retarded comment ev3r.




What I meant to say is 3 is lighter than 6 and although 3 got a smaller engine - I felt like 3 accelerates better. But when it climbs into higher RPMs engine feels like it coming out of breath (comparing to Duratech)




It may feel like the 3 accelerates better (and it does feel that way), but it doesn't. Not even close. A 6s gets to 60 over half a second faster than the 3s does, and gets to the 1/4 a full second faster. And the 3.0L responds much more readily to mods than the 2.3L has been.

And in looks I'll take my 6 over a 3 (and most any other car in your list) any day:


I wonder though -- you call the fastest car on your list, the RX-8, "slow"?


2003 Mazda6s 3.0L MTX Webpage
2004 Mazda3s 2.3L ATX