Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
#1019996 08/08/04 01:32 AM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 768
A
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
A
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 768
def not the only one but everybody else is quiet and tries to look like they are in the know

I'm guessing it's way past the level of sophistication of TwEECer though.

I wonder how soon we will have enough interested ppl to justify EEC forum. (like this one: corral.net EEC Tech forum) That would be geeky

I did some searching yesterday (cause I too was interested in WTF Demon is talking about). Some interesting stuff, admittedly not easy to jump start. Anybody cares to post a link to a decent 101 page (like this one)? Perhaps separate thread and a sticky?
TwEECer
http://tweecer.oplnk.net/

all thread highjackers should be prosecuted


#1019997 08/08/04 04:33 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
LM-1 is a wideband O2 controller made by Innovate. IMO nothing can touch it on the market!

I built an LM-1 output cable that can do 2 things.

The 1st channel simulates a narrow band O2 sensor (very easy circuit)

This means I could technically run my whole car off of just the wideband. Also the adaptive control would be run by an extremely more accurate sensor.
(I have the rear O2's turned off but MIL's do the same thing)

The 2nd channel feeds the S-AFC a modified voltage signal.

Therefore the input to the S-AFC allows me to have the actual A/F ratio (as in 13.2, 14.7, etc) display in real time on my S-AFC.
The S-AFC is an exceptional digital gauge package.

Also my S-AFC can log it along with it's other inputs (rpm, airflow, etc)


So basically I have a VERY VISIBLE and 100% accurate A/F gauge that can be logged verses other inputs and replayed from my driver's seat without needing a laptop.



The LM-1 Aux input cable is just like it says. An input cable for the LM-1 unit with a built in RPM converter.
The resolution will be about 5 times as good as the one Innovate sells and the response time about 10 fold. It also costs about 1/10 of theirs too. Hence why I am building it myself.


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
#1019998 08/08/04 05:27 AM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 768
A
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
A
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 768
It took some time to digest...

One thing is for sure though. Nobody can say your approach to tuning is anything less than fundamental

#1019999 08/09/04 05:22 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
I call it Fun.

The wife calls it Mental.


I guess that really does make it range from Fun d mental...


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
#1020000 08/09/04 12:55 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117
T
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
T
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
I call it Fun.

The wife calls it Mental.


I guess that really does make it range from Fun d mental...




He's here all week folks....


Must be that jumbly-wumbly thing happening again.
#1020001 08/10/04 01:04 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779
J
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
J
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779
Quote:

He's here all week folks....






99 SVTC, T-Red, #652/2760-12.8.1998 Mother#@%@!* did I sound abstract? I hope it sounded more confusin than that!
#1020002 08/10/04 01:40 AM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,713
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,713
Demon, I wanna see a picture of your dash one of these days. I bet it displays more information at any given moment than my brain can digest. And it's accurate, to boot!
That's cool info, though. Here I just settled on that dinky blinky light A/F Autometer gauge. I always tell people, "It's really not as informative as I had hoped..."

Thread - officially hijacked


Derek Scion xB 5-spd Previous: 2000 Silver Frost SVT Please share the road with cyclists.
#1020003 08/11/04 03:59 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 40
T
New CEG\'er
OP Offline
New CEG\'er
T
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 40
It's not sarcasism. Demon is the first to respond to my posts and will explain it to me as many times as it takes for me to understand. You have to be extremely knowledgable and patient to perform all the mods he has done. I know from experience NONE of these mods work right out of the box, for these cars or others. You have to be able to fabricate, redesign and reengineer most of the aftermarket parts to perform better or at least as advertised. Demon, what do you do for a living? Thanks again for all your responses, no sense doing the same job over and over if some knows from expereince.
This is one of the only performance cars I've owned that aftermarket parts, or even parts were available. I had a TR250, TVR and a Lotus 7, to name a few. If you wanted to enhance the performance you had to come up with the idea then make it. and remake it and remake and remake it till it worked. The same with a lot of the parts. I had the Lotus doing 1.1 G's in 1986, with street tires, inboard coilovers like the old F1. I put a 13B rotary in it, over 200 HP. The car tipped the scales at 1250lbs. I had the TVR handling close to that, but could never get the TR250 to handle the way I wanted. I'm sure Demon would have done close to the same things I did, he seems to like high horses and like slideing thru windy roads with control.

#1020004 08/16/04 05:41 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,621
B
Redneck Troll
Offline
Redneck Troll
B
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,621
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by JEDsContour:
I have to say that anyone who has been here awhile sees that DemonSVT really does have a phenomenal understanding of what works with our cars, and I think he is pretty damn good about sharing his experience and understanding.



Then the tuners here will love my current projects...

LM-1 output cable (done)
S-AFC input cable (done)
LM-1 Aux Input cable with regulated RPM converter (designed and waiting on a few chips)

...and those are just the ones I can talk about.




I, for one, love hearing about your projects! Since I'm involved in tuning my 18 year old GM computer, I can appreciate what you're doing for the uncracked code and logging priorities you have. Logging = your only fallback for changing binary codes that may or may not do what you think it does. Some fields are set values, some are mutipliers... 5% change on a set value is not much, but a 5% change on a multiplier = OOPS!!!

How far along are you on cracking things with TwEECer anyway? Gotta tell you, I hated writing my own code to expand some resolution on one of my maps... I'd hate to be the one trying to crack things...


http://www.bnmotorsports.com "And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my CEG brothers. And you will know I am the Moderator when I lay my vengeance upon you."
#1020005 08/16/04 11:00 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Originally posted by bnoon:
How far along are you on cracking things with TwEECer anyway? Gotta tell you, I hated writing my own code to expand some resolution on one of my maps... I'd hate to be the one trying to crack things...



I can program just about everything that "should" be "played" with.

I can program several things that really "should not" be "played" with.

I have a few things I can change (easily that is) but that I still don't have any "real" information on as of yet.

I can program all the transmission functions. Too bad I don't have a slushbox. Well NOT really too bad I guess...

I had not looked more into it for a while until my IMRC died a month or so ago. They I had no choice but to get off my duff or spend $100+ on something I wasn't using anyway. It was a hard choice...


I have the rpm converter circuit designed and laid out.
Matter of fact that's my plans for tonight to start soldering everything together and testing the circuits.

As I normally do I think I over engineered it but then again it's built in such a way that there will never be any input voltage deviation, beyond minimum ripple, & incredible output resolution. (It has a built in voltage doubler and regulator so input voltage is fixed and above the minimum needed for the opamps to stay accurate. )

The higher the rpm (Hz input) the more accurate the circuit.
For instance it has a +/- 30 rpm deviation at 4000 rpm.
At 8000 rpm it's only +/- 12 rpm. (4.86v on a 5v capped scale)

I used that as the top of the scale to maximize resolution per Hz. (That formula was the easy one - the V ripple verses C2 was a freakin' PITA! )


For reference the LM-1 unit is quite accurate itself and has minimum deviation of + or - 50 rpm. (100rpm total) However their's gets worse the higher the rpm. (for instance their minimum deviation at 8k rpm is +/- 80rpm)
They trade off less resolution and response time for self learning rpm scaling (very cool from a business standpoint!!! Love to see that circuit) and a higher rpm scale.
In the grand scheme even that minimum 160rpm total deviation is not much really. Though I don't think they factored in voltage ripple. That looks like just the deviation of their chip and circuit.

Also my version cost about $30 total and I can build 2 cables plus enough IC's and misc stuff left over to build 3 rpm switches of any kind.
($60-80 for an MSD switch - What mark up! )


I do feel like I've had a years worth of EE classes compiled into 1 month though...


2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  GTO Pete 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5