well if you do shorten the lower intake u do actually move the power band, but you also give up some low end torque and gain some MORE HP in the higher rev area! Which is where our svts make most of our power.
Honestly it wouldn't move the power band as much as you where thinking, It's not going to gain another 1,000 rpms, it's only prob gain maybe another 250-500rpms, enough to still produce more Horse power till 7 grand. I don't have a v-tec so i wasn't going to have a 9 grand redline just 7,000 since our immediate shift brings our rpms back down to 4,000 it would be nice when it backed down, it could be alittle higher than that.
How much higher i don't know that is why i am asking this question. I am hoping others have tried this. It was only a question and an idea for people to throw there two cents in about this intake and to hear what others think, all i heard was people judging the idea then trying to find out if it will actuall work or not. All i was told is about other things than what i asked for, which is what do you guys think of this intake idea?
1#shorten length
2#intake spacer
3#leave it alone?
When i brought this topic up, i was hoping this was already done. I was hoping to get some info, I never said i was going to do this? It was up for discussion!
Gearhead, i was looking at the sp motorsports website about that returnless fuel system, I have a lower intake but it is of a contour 2.5, i kinda needed one from an svt.
But i will look on car-part.com. thanks
