Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#1018530 08/03/04 01:21 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779
J
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
J
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779
I'm glad you apologized, but it's still in writing. I'm not attacking you nor thinking of you as a 16 yr old...ok maybe a little on the 16 yr old part, but that's just me, by the way you type and questions you ask. You still didn't answer my perfectly valid question about raising the powerband....I'm being nice to you after the whole y pipe joke, but obviously you're still holding some sort of grudge. I thought we were cool, but I guess not. I guess I'll go find the E-thug picture....


99 SVTC, T-Red, #652/2760-12.8.1998 Mother#@%@!* did I sound abstract? I hope it sounded more confusin than that!
#1018531 08/03/04 01:54 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,651
H
Harrry Offline OP
Hard-core CEG\'er
OP Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
H
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,651
The apology was to restore some respect within this forum, but of course it's ignorant pieces of s&%t like you who don't have the common courtesy to show any respect.

I apologized, but you of course have to come out on top like your a 16yr old kid who thinks his CHROME rims makes his car look good.

Where Iā??m from we call women like winers!I'm 16 huh nice joke, it's not that I hold a grudge but it's I don't like people who comment on others ideas by belittling them.

You weren't born someone great you where taught also.

SO make a long story short we where cool till you made a silly as comment about why would I do that? To the intake, making my original post, if you open your little eyes my dear and sees this was a discussion!!

To answer your question my daughter it is because since our cars where made to rev? "Correct" revving meaning an increase in rpms, which is substantially amount of rotation of gearing.

Well since others have super chips like "I". I was thinking there is no point to get a chip for the high revs like I heard others say. Example "it's nice revving to 7,000 now that I have my chip in" When you don't make power in that high of a rev, so I was coming up with alternative methods to possibly create more power at high revs, since major companies don't sell aftermarket intake manifolds other than sho-shop that are modified.


But I don't like playing e-fights thatā??s what nerds do, so why don't you never post on a thread I start and Iā??ll never post on a thread you start!!! DING DING DING! WOW maybe two adults could come to a conclusion or maybe it takes one to propose the idea!


I reject your reality and substitute my own.
#1018532 08/03/04 05:53 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779
J
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
J
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779
Quote:

Where Iā??m from we call women like winers!




Is that in english?

Obviously you can only make yourself feel better by calling people pieces of s!#^* and talking giberish, but I have no need to bust out the name calling, that's just plain childish. I'll post in any post I wish to, and I don't wish to take away that freedom from you either, so quit acting like you're in 3rd grade. Back to the topic, yes you can join...
So in effect, you want to shift the powerband, not widen it. Back to my original issue, why? Do you want to make a peaky Honda powerband? As for raising the rpms, I would recommend "checking" your bearings before that. The whole point is, what benefits do you see in shifting the powerband higher in a street car? No more gain in power necessarily, just moving it up and out of the daily driving range. Is this a civilized enough question for you because you still haven't answered it....

BTW, I love CHROME! How did you know?

Last edited by JonnySVT; 08/03/04 05:54 AM.

99 SVTC, T-Red, #652/2760-12.8.1998 Mother#@%@!* did I sound abstract? I hope it sounded more confusin than that!
#1018533 08/03/04 12:51 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,145
G
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
G
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,145
there is another LIM other then the ShoShop one. its from the cougar's, its refered to as the returnless LIM, its bigger then the stock one by a couple of MM, i believe the stock svt is 33mm/34mm, dont quote me though, and the "returnless" is a 34mm/35mm (i know for sure on that), the returnless's come off 99+ cougar's and can be found on www.car-parts.com

gotta question for you though, why do you want to move the powerband higher up?? right now the powerband is from ~3500rpm to redline(WOT) and if your not WOT then it is ~4000 to redline, what more do you need, thats plenty i think


98.5 Black SE ATX S&B filter, SVT MAF, optimized SVT TB, mesh grille, removed orange reflectors, painted rear reflector, gutted pre-cats, optimized SVT LIM, 19lb injectors, resonator removed cant afford an svt but lookin for 1 in nc
#1018534 08/03/04 03:34 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,651
H
Harrry Offline OP
Hard-core CEG\'er
OP Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
H
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,651
well if you do shorten the lower intake u do actually move the power band, but you also give up some low end torque and gain some MORE HP in the higher rev area! Which is where our svts make most of our power.

Honestly it wouldn't move the power band as much as you where thinking, It's not going to gain another 1,000 rpms, it's only prob gain maybe another 250-500rpms, enough to still produce more Horse power till 7 grand. I don't have a v-tec so i wasn't going to have a 9 grand redline just 7,000 since our immediate shift brings our rpms back down to 4,000 it would be nice when it backed down, it could be alittle higher than that.
How much higher i don't know that is why i am asking this question. I am hoping others have tried this. It was only a question and an idea for people to throw there two cents in about this intake and to hear what others think, all i heard was people judging the idea then trying to find out if it will actuall work or not. All i was told is about other things than what i asked for, which is what do you guys think of this intake idea?

1#shorten length
2#intake spacer
3#leave it alone?


When i brought this topic up, i was hoping this was already done. I was hoping to get some info, I never said i was going to do this? It was up for discussion!

Gearhead, i was looking at the sp motorsports website about that returnless fuel system, I have a lower intake but it is of a contour 2.5, i kinda needed one from an svt.
But i will look on car-part.com. thanks


I reject your reality and substitute my own.
#1018535 08/03/04 04:30 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,145
G
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
G
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,145
might wanna check out these websites


#1

#2

#3

read this article

linky


98.5 Black SE ATX S&B filter, SVT MAF, optimized SVT TB, mesh grille, removed orange reflectors, painted rear reflector, gutted pre-cats, optimized SVT LIM, 19lb injectors, resonator removed cant afford an svt but lookin for 1 in nc
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  GTO Pete 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5