|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 199
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 199 |
Originally posted by JAGSVT: If kerry wins, im gonna have to start eating my hot dogs with mustard--and i really dont want to have to start doing that.
Nope. There is a solution to that problem.
Heinz Ketchup Alternative 
A ketchup that is made by a company that doesn't outsource jobs.
Actually my dad has bought some and it doesn't taste the same, but its better than buying ketchup from that wacky lady.
2000 Acura 3.2 TL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 937
Veteran CEG\'er
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 937 |
Bumping this up. The Gallup pole statistics are starting to look very similar to CEG's: 55% to 42% for the good guys.
99 Tropic Green SVT, Tan Leather, 20K miles, "Nice Twin" (factory stock).
99 Tropic Green SVT, Tan Leather, 28K miles, "Evil Twin" (Turbo AER 3L and more in progress)
96 Red LX, Opal Grey Leather 2.5L, ATX, 22K miles
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,397
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,397 |
Originally posted by JEDsContour: Bumping this up. The Gallup pole statistics are starting to look very similar to CEG's: 55% to 42% for the good guys.
Who exactly are the "good guys" cause I don't see any "good guys" in this election.
Formerly known as Sneaku
I MISS MY BABY!!!
'00 Blk CSVT #1087/2150 built 12/23/99
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198 |
Bush and Cheney are the good guys.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,397
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,397 |
Originally posted by Davo: Bush and Cheney are the good guys.

Call them the not-quite-as-bad guys maybe but I wouldn't call any of our current presidential candidates "good guys"
Formerly known as Sneaku
I MISS MY BABY!!!
'00 Blk CSVT #1087/2150 built 12/23/99
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198 |
What prevents them from being the good guys? Please don't mention conspiracy theories.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,397
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,397 |
Originally posted by Davo: What prevents them from being the good guys? Please don't mention conspiracy theories.
What's the point of mentioning anything? You are so solidly set in your partisan beliefs that nothing anyone says will change your opinion. You've already made up your mind before someone speaks on partisan political issues. As I've said before this is exactly why I don't claim a party. I see good things and bad on both sides of the fence and I keep an open mind about politics. Hardcore partisans refuse to ever see the other sides because they are too caught up in ragging on the other party.
Why do you think that pretty much every political thread on these boards ends up with people resorting to insults upon each other at some point?
Formerly known as Sneaku
I MISS MY BABY!!!
'00 Blk CSVT #1087/2150 built 12/23/99
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198 |
That's one of the more creative ways to dodge a question that I've seen in a while.
I consider myself an idealogue, not a partisan. Yes, I become a partisan during the election season, but only because I have to. But 90% of the time you will see me commenting and debating along an ideological line, not a partisan one.
Usually people resort to name-calling only when they don't want to answer a question, much like you did above. You didn't want to answer the question, either because you don't have an answer or because you'd rather imagine how much of a partisan I am.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,397
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,397 |
Originally posted by Davo: That's one of the more creative ways to dodge a question that I've seen in a while.
I consider myself an idealogue, not a partisan. Yes, I become a partisan during the election season, but only because I have to. But 90% of the time you will see me commenting and debating along an ideological line, not a partisan one.
Usually people resort to name-calling only when they don't want to answer a question, much like you did above. You didn't want to answer the question, either because you don't have an answer or because you'd rather imagine how much of a partisan I am.
It's so sad to me that you cannot even see the hipocrisy in your own words. This reminds me of that other thread where Swazo and you got into it and you sat there all smug-like saying basically the same thing "I won, I'm right you're wrong and you have to call me names because of it" [/loose translation off] yet I could pull up numerous posts where you resort to the name calling you claim I have done (which btw I'd love you to show me where that happened unless you're saying "partisan" equals name calling ) yet often if someone doesn't agree with you you resort to calling them stupid, ignorant, etc.
I'm surprised you don't like Kerry...you seem to be a lot like him. Don't address most of the issues but instead point the finger and someone else and try to make them look bad by whatever means you can muster up then sit back and claim victory.
Everyone's entitled to have an opinion. Just because that opinion doesn't jive with yours doesn't make them stupid or ignorant. Diversity is part of what makes the U.S. so great so maybe you should work on tolerance a little more instead of trying to bash everyone who doesn't see things your way.
That's about as much time as I feel like wasting on this issue...anything else is obviously pretty pointless so have a nice day.
Formerly known as Sneaku
I MISS MY BABY!!!
'00 Blk CSVT #1087/2150 built 12/23/99
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198 |
Originally posted by Freakshow: blah blah blah blah blah blah
My thoughts exactly.
Have I called names here? Yes. Entirely in response though. As I said above, sometimes the conversation turns to name calling when excellent points are made that cannot be responded to or there are questions that someone does not want to answer (like you, above).
I like how most people call holding an opinion "arrogance" and "not wanting to see both sides of the issues". I call it having an opinion. Do I often say things and insist that I am right? You bet -- because I believe in what I say. If you think I'm being ignorant by not consulting you before I form an opinion, then yes, I am ignorant. But most would consider that having core beliefs.
|
|
|
|
|