|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,032
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,032 |
Thanks for the info.
Is that 1 cubic foot rear chamber for each sub or both subs using the same chamber?
1999 SVT #900/2760 Born on 1-20-99 Silver Frost/Midnight Blue A few aesthetic and audio mods
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142
Moderator
|
Moderator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142 |
1 cubic foot total for both subs (same chamber)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,032
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,032 |
Originally posted by dnewma04: It looks like a bandpass using both woofers would need a 1 cu. ft. rear chamber, and a .625 cu. ft. front chamber. The front chamber would need a port 3" round by 6.4" long. This would be the ideal box, but you could get away with a .75 cu ft rear chamber fully stuffed. This set up should give you ~5-6db more output from 50-85 hz, than your infinite baffle setup. It rolls off pretty sharply under 50 hz. With cabin gain, you should have usable response into the mid to low 30 hz range. Hey Dave, I ran the WinISD program and input my sub's parameters along with a dual woofer 4th order bandpass box. Here's what it came up with: Front chamber: 1.18 cubic feet Rear chamber: 1.90 cubic feet port diameter: 4.02" port length: 5" Am I doing something wrong with the program or something? It's showing a flat response from 45Hz to 75Hz. Here are the sub's specs per the operating instructions: FS: 36.8Hz Qms: 3.04 Qes: 0.55 Qts: 0.44 Vas: 44L (1.5 ft^3) EBP: 66 Revc (2 each @) Ohms: 3.6 SPL: 88.3dB Xmax (mm) linear peak-peak: 14 Levc(mH): 0.72 Power handling: 200W continuous Thanks for any light you can shed on this. -Colin
1999 SVT #900/2760 Born on 1-20-99 Silver Frost/Midnight Blue A few aesthetic and audio mods
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142
Moderator
|
Moderator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142 |
Yes, the parameters you have listed are completely different than what i found on the internet. That will greatly affect the response and box.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17 |
BTW bandpass boxes usually have a narrow freq range of 50-85 hz and lower hz they suffer dramatically, and same with the upper hz. Now what is this cabin gain all about?
bleh......
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,585
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,585 |
Originally posted by bleh...: BTW bandpass boxes usually have a narrow freq range of 50-85 hz and lower hz they suffer dramatically, and same with the upper hz. Now what is this cabin gain all about? Cabin, room, environment gain, [edit]transfer funtion[/edit], all the same idea. In a car, due to its small volume, increases the level of sound by about 12dB/octave going down from about 40-50Hz. So, as the speaker starts rolling off usually in that same range, cabin gain will compensate and you end up with a naturally flat sound.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142
Moderator
|
Moderator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142 |
Don't forget transfer function on your list of synonyms!
Aarons right on, 12dB per octave is pretty typical and is used as a baseline. In small hatchbacks the gain will start as high as 80-100 hz.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,032
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,032 |
1999 SVT #900/2760 Born on 1-20-99 Silver Frost/Midnight Blue A few aesthetic and audio mods
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,032
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,032 |
Oops. My bad. Sorry for bringing up the old post. 
1999 SVT #900/2760 Born on 1-20-99 Silver Frost/Midnight Blue A few aesthetic and audio mods
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142
Moderator
|
Moderator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142 |
Since you brought it back up. I now use Unibox. It is a much more comprehensive box building program. It's a bit more complex, and requires excel 2000, but it is very very nice.
|
|
|
|
|