|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,301
Addicted CEG\'er
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,301 |
Damn, if I had a Focus, it would look just like that 
-Ken V.
1998.5 SE Praire Tan Zetec ATX
psycho_bass@hotmail.com
Roush springs Roush rear sway bar BAT struts 17" Millie Miglia HT3 and a ton of subtle asthetic mods
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,610
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,610 |
Awesome cars!!! I probably personally would have kept the focus just cause there are not many that are that fast. But RX-7's are a badass car!!! Nice! 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,143
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,143 |
wow, that engine is amaizingly clean, only problem I can see to owning a sports car like that is Insurance. But that RX7 looks brand spankin new, you should have good fun with that.
98 Corolla LE 1.8L DOHC 1ZZFE
TEIN H.Tech Springs
Tokico HP series Struts
Short ram air intake
Tsudo Axel Back Exhaust
... if a jelly fish stung me.. would you pee on the wound?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106 |
95mph? that's really low.. I ran a 14.6 @ 97 in my Tour.. You should be above 100mph Id think..
Mark
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by Y2KSVT:
95mph? that's really low.. I ran a 14.6 @ 97 in my Tour.. You should be above 100mph Id think..
I was just going to let the go being this is the pics forum but yeah 14 flat at 95 from a FWD car is definitely not very realistic at all.
My lightened SVT (~2950lbs or less vs ~2800 for the focus) ran high 14's at 95mph. That's with boat loads more power and a much broader curve as well.
Then if you consider the large diameter & heavy wheels... 
So very good point indeed.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,346
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,346 |
DAMn.....talk about ur upgrades
E1 CSVT
s/c-----x
turbo---x
3L------check
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17
New CEG\'er
|
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17 |
Originally posted by ShinyRedSport:
Thats pretty fast! How much of those foci mods are able to be used on the 2.0 contour?
Most of them could have been used on your car, except the head.
1993 Mazda RX7
12.9 @ 107MPH
1998.5 SVT Contour
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17
New CEG\'er
|
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17 |
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by Y2KSVT:
95mph? that's really low.. I ran a 14.6 @ 97 in my Tour.. You should be above 100mph Id think..
I was just going to let the go being this is the pics forum but yeah 14 flat at 95 from a FWD car is definitely not very realistic at all.
My lightened SVT (~2950lbs or less vs ~2800 for the focus) ran high 14's at 95mph. That's with boat loads more power and a much broader curve as well.
Then if you consider the large diameter & heavy wheels...
So very good point indeed.
Actually my focus was 2670 with me in it at race time. And I'm 230 lbs, so figure that. It had 164hp and 136tq at the wheels. But i don't see many contours cutting 1.9 60foot's allmotor like i did.
1993 Mazda RX7
12.9 @ 107MPH
1998.5 SVT Contour
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17
New CEG\'er
|
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17 |
Originally posted by AliasJerk:
wow, that engine is amaizingly clean, only problem I can see to owning a sports car like that is Insurance. But that RX7 looks brand spankin new, you should have good fun with that.
Actually the insurance on the RX7 is cheaper than the 98 SVT contour. I only pay about $66 bucks a month full coverage for it 
1993 Mazda RX7
12.9 @ 107MPH
1998.5 SVT Contour
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,143
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 8,143 |
Originally posted by Russell:
So very good point indeed.
Actually my focus was 2670 with me in it at race time. And I'm 230 lbs, so figure that. It had 164hp and 136tq at the wheels. But i don't see many contours cutting 1.9 60foot's allmotor like i did.
ive never seen a contour run under a 2.1 60' period
my guess is that you're one hell of a driver...all I know is that I'm jealous of that zetec. Not alot of power but u seem to make good use of what it had.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
