|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14
New CEG\'er
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14 |
My father installed new stuts on my car a few months ago as a surprise birthday gift. I now have 4" of space above my front tire and only 1/2" above the rears. Everything that I have looked at in this group involves lowering springs that require stiffer than stock struts. I can't replace the struts that my father just purchased and installed for me because that would basically tell him he bought me crap, which would go over like a lead balloon. Also I cannot make my car ride any stiffer because my wife and kid are regularly in the car. If they decide the ride is too stiff, I will begin riding in the passenger side of an Escape.
My question is what type of springs should I put on my car to lower the front end by about 2 inches and possibly raise the rear end about 1/2"? I want to get the factory stance back without the nose in the air, but apparently the factory springs are just a bit too strong with the Gabriel GasRyder struts.
Last edited by Joebob; 03/14/04 06:11 PM.
'99 Contour LX
2.0L 4 Cyl
Everything Stock
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779 |
99 SVTC, T-Red, #652/2760-12.8.1998
Mother#@%@!* did I sound abstract?
I hope it sounded more confusin than that!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14
New CEG\'er
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14 |
I looked at the H&Rs because I keep seeing 1.4"F and 1.1"R drop, but those specs are for 98 and earlier models. The H&R '99 and newer springs give an even 1.1" at all 4 points.
'99 Contour LX
2.0L 4 Cyl
Everything Stock
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14
New CEG\'er
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14 |
Originally posted by Joebob: I looked at the H&Rs because I keep seeing 1.4"F and 1.1"R drop, but those specs are for 98 and earlier models. The H&R '99 and newer springs give an even 1.1" at all 4 points.
The actual diminsions are 1.75F/1.25R for the 98's and older, 1.4F/1.3R for the 99 and newer.
'99 Contour LX
2.0L 4 Cyl
Everything Stock
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,475
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,475 |
Originally posted by Joebob: I now have 4" of space above my front tire and only 1/2" above the rears.
Uh ... someone correct me if I'm wrong here but something is terribly wrong with your suspension with those kind of gaps. Heck my rear dosen't sit nearly that low and I have the BAT springs. Are you sure your rear springs arent broken?? Or do you have something really heavy in the trunk?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14
New CEG\'er
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14 |
I wouldn't be surprised if my springs are on the edge of self-destruction because they have 125000 miles on 'em. I haven't check lately, but 4 months ago none of them were broken. I do have a sub box sitting in my trunk directly over my rear wheels, but it only ways about 70#.
One of the problems that I have currently is what are the stock ride heights of a '99 Contour LX with a 2.0 liter? I figure my rear springs are shot and the front is sticking in the air since all the weight has been shifted aft. Without the stock heights, I cannot judge which aftermarket springs I need to get. I always have the subs in the back and usually have a computer or 2 also (100# to 130#). I occasionally have a passenger, but never have adults in the rear seat.
I am so frustrated that I may end up takinig it to a suspension shop and letting them rape me!
'99 Contour LX
2.0L 4 Cyl
Everything Stock
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,045
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,045 |
2 comps and a sub box (approx 200lbs) on worn out sprngs in back......sounds like you answered your question there. i put about that much in my csvt (in good shape) coming home from costco and the rear was not happy. only did that once. less weight and new springs, even stock might help alot imho
00 black/tan svt, #2052 of 2150, born 2/1/00
formerly known as my csvt
"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than a sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." -Martin Luther King, Jr.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14
New CEG\'er
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14 |
Just for laughs I pulled everything out of the trunk and was a little surprised. The front end is still up in the air and the back is only 1/4" higher.
I must have been a little cross-eyed when I first measured the gaps. The front is 1.5" higher than the rear, which is substantially less than originally posted, but it still looks bad. Since lowering springs are stiffer than normal, will they help hold up the ash end while lowering the front?
'99 Contour LX
2.0L 4 Cyl
Everything Stock
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,426
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,426 |
It's my understanding that if you use lowering springs, you should also replace the struts. Anybody know how it's gonna work with new stock (I guess) struts and lowering springs?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14
New CEG\'er
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 14 |
I have discovered that the GasRyder struts my father installed are stiffer than stock (they are high pressure gas), but I don't think they are much stiffer.
'99 Contour LX
2.0L 4 Cyl
Everything Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|