|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 90
CEG\'er
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 90 |
Do you guys think that this is really worth it. I will be pulling my motor so I might as well put one on since I have it out, but if you don't think I will need it, I will also have a fidanza and spec 2 clutch, let me know what you think
Still workin on her!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025 |
Is it worth it?!! Why do you think they come standard on the Mazda 6 now!
Jim Hahn
1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04
3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
I bought one and noticed absolutely no difference.
I still kept my old one. I've also never had any issues with my rod bearings or oiling. I ran the old one the whole time my 3L engine was in the car and a few months with the turbo. NO ISSUES from 1999 to summer of 03 when I changed it. The old one was starting to get a tiny groove from the lip seal but still wasn't leaking at all.
Is it better? I have to say that it does have the potential to be better because it can damp out more resonances than the stock one, but I don't think there is any proof. I wouldn't buy it if there is nothing wrong with the old one or if you are only buying it because you are scared of the bearings going out. I'm about 99% convinced the bearings go out because of oil starvation and not crank whip.
Tom
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 91
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 91 |
I felt a difference at high rpms. The engine feels smoother above 3500. I find myself staying in 4th gear sometimes when I should be in 5th because of the decreased vibrations. There could be other factors at play too. Maybe my engine mounts are worn, so I felt more vibrations with stock crank pulley. I don't know. But I did feel a difference. If you decide to get one, get if from Bill Jenkins at Signature Lincoln/Ford in Las Vegas. He sells them for about $50 if I remember correctly. Cheapest I have seen anywhere.
06 Mustang GT - stock
96 SE V6 5spd Midnight Red - 15.9 @ 86.8
150K miles
Mods: Bilstein struts, H&R springs, Borla Cat-Back, Brullen y-pipe, Gutted Precats, SVT UIM+LIM+TB, K&N FIPK, , DMD, Magnecor KV85
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,867
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,867 |
Originally posted by NJE96SE: I felt a difference at high rpms. The engine feels smoother above 3500. I find myself staying in 4th gear sometimes when I should be in 5th because of the decreased vibrations.
Ditto. I catch myself "cruising" in 4th at 60 to 65 mph (and other times I do it on purpose, waiting for a passing opportunity...) I never could do that with the stock pulley.
Any hp change (+ or -) is not enough to notice.
I think it's a good combo with the flywheel and clutch mods, esp.
But I'm no Warmonger, either. Just that the racing and engine building experts that I've read say that the flywheel/clutch is a good place to shave weight, but that the harmonic damper isn't. Some cases where adding weight/damping to the HD allows for increased hp. (I'm not saying the DMD will add power, though.)
Function before fashion.
'96 Contour SE
"Toss the Contour into a corner, and it's as easy to catch as a softball thrown by a preschooler." -Edmunds, 1998
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by warmonger: I'm about 99% convinced the bearings go out because of oil starvation and not crank whip.
I'll even add the other 1% to that statement!
The DMD is for NVH only. (which it quells fairly noticeably)
Also it should not gain or lose any power compared to the stock damper.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117 |
Originally posted by beyondloadedSE: Is it worth it?!! Why do you think they come standard on the Mazda 6 now!
I put one on my car (ATX) and noticed nothing, but I think the ATXs have added mass that dampens vibrations more VS the MTX cars anyway. I have also read in one discussion about this topic that racing teams usually install something akin to a DMD to preserve their engines. If true this post & the one above speak volumes. The Jag X-types come with DMDs as well, I'm told.
Must be that jumbly-wumbly thing happening again.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,867
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,867 |
Originally posted by TourDeForce: Originally posted by beyondloadedSE: Is it worth it?!! Why do you think they come standard on the Mazda 6 now!
I have also read in one discussion about this topic that racing teams usually install something akin to a DMD to preserve their engines.
They do it to get power. Reduction in parisitic loss to vibration, plus more stable cam profiles. And these guys are religious about weight.
Function before fashion.
'96 Contour SE
"Toss the Contour into a corner, and it's as easy to catch as a softball thrown by a preschooler." -Edmunds, 1998
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 7,117 |
Originally posted by RogerB: Originally posted by TourDeForce: Originally posted by beyondloadedSE: Is it worth it?!! Why do you think they come standard on the Mazda 6 now!
I have also read in one discussion about this topic that racing teams usually install something akin to a DMD to preserve their engines.
They do it to get power. Reduction in parisitic loss to vibration, plus more stable cam profiles. And these guys are religious about weight.
I have learned yet again.
Must be that jumbly-wumbly thing happening again.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 151
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 151 |
|
|
|
|
|