Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#63115 06/12/02 01:52 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 20
J
JCA Offline OP
Junior Member
OP Offline
Junior Member
J
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 20
Hey,

Ok, i get 500km a tank on regular fuel and only 300km a tank on premium.

I figured by using a higher octane i might gain a few kms per tank. Can someone explain to me why i am terribly wrong?

thanks,jca
confused

#63116 06/12/02 02:04 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 164
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 164
I was always told that all gasoline has the same BTU energy potential. The additives that increase the octane to 89 or 92 prevent knocking that occurs with higher compression engines. That using 92 octane in a car rated for 87 was just a waste of money. confused


- Jim

'96 Mystique GS, Ztech - ATX,
with CD changer, Sylvania Cool Blues, sunroof, keyless entry, and 9mm blue wires
#63117 06/12/02 03:45 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,329
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,329
Premium has a higher flash point. (slower to ignite)

Normally aspirated vehicles.

The cars requiring premium normally have advanced ignition timing starting the flame front earlier and allowing for a longer burn time.

A car programmed to run regular fuel would still have timing set for regular fuel and not start the flame front as early and therefore lose power and efficiency because the fuel was not achieving maximum burn time.

Simple explanation. Other factors are involved as well.


2000 SVT #674 - Check it out!

Whoever coined the phrase; "If it ain't broke; don't fix it" ~ Just doesn't get it...
#63118 06/12/02 06:52 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,537
R
Member
Offline
Member
R
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,537
I agree with DemonSVT.

Same thing happened to my Tour, until I installed a DiabloSport chip.
The chip requires 91 octane or higher for the best performance.
With the chip installed, I am using 93 octane now, and getting the same MPG as 89 octane.

Even BETTER highway MPG.


Pete...

98.5 SE Sport Duratec ATX (P66L)
Black Clearcoat on Greystone
DOB 11/21/1997
DOP 12/25/1997
PIAA 510 Super White Driving Lights
SVT CAT-BACK EXHAUST (No Resonator)
DiabloSport Chip (LPQ4) - Engineered To Raise Hell
Too many other mods to list...
Sounds sweet, runs quick...
Crazy Horse Dyno @ 121.4 WHP/129.6 TQ
#63119 06/12/02 04:24 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 494
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 494
Quote:
Originally posted by JCA:
Hey,

Ok, i get 500km a tank on regular fuel and only 300km a tank on premium.

I figured by using a higher octane i might gain a few kms per tank. Can someone explain to me why i am terribly wrong?

thanks,jca
confused
confused

I get 520km on a tank of gas driving hwy/city with a heavy foot! Plus I use 92 octane all the time! confused

I don't know why you would have such a big difference and I don't!

Make sure that your driving habits and city/hwy are the same when you do the comparison.

Stephen


96 Contour, GL, Zetec, ATX.
03/18/1996 Build Date.
Drop in K&N
NGK Laser Platinum Premium Spark plugs
Niehoff Premium Ignition wires
Wheel Well Air Intake Resonator removed.
*Just the beginning*
#63120 06/12/02 06:26 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 307
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Premium has a higher flash point. (slower to ignite)

Normally aspirated vehicles.

The cars requiring premium normally have advanced ignition timing starting the flame front earlier and allowing for a longer burn time.

A car programmed to run regular fuel would still have timing set for regular fuel and not start the flame front as early and therefore lose power and efficiency because the fuel was not achieving maximum burn time.

Simple explanation. Other factors are involved as well.
I respect your opinion (the flash point thing I'm not sure about right now, still checking), but I have to disargee with you on that one. I get better mileage out of the 92/93 octane than I do the 87 in both of my vehicles, and I have no altered computer program/chip in either. For some reason in my tours early life (under 10K), the premium gas I used actually killed 4 O2 sensors. I switched back to 87, no more lost O2 sensors. Now the real funny part is that I went back to 93 octane again and I haven't lost an O2 sensor since November 2000. I have no clue what to make of my car sometimes...


'99 Contour SE V6 w/MTX (Black Clearcoat)
'02 Dakota 4.7L V8 2WD X-Cab (Flame Red Clearcoat)

Moderated by  horseydug_dup1, Ray_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5