Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,211
S
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
S
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,211
Isn't it crazy that alot of these rear strut tower braces look identical? Like Performance Fords, Bat, and so on. Maybe they are all built by the same company?

I'll tell you the one to get for the rear would be Performance Fords or Bat or whoever(Since they are all built by Performance Fords and then distributed).


RamMotorsports Lowest prices on SPEC Clutches and Flywheels
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6
M
Newbie
Offline
Newbie
M
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6
Personally, I would not spend my money on tower strut bars. Though the Tour is not a very stiff uni-body, you have to look at the strut location ascompared to laterial bulkheads such as the firewall. The real problem with the Tour is the twist between the front and rear of the car. Jack your car up and you'll see what I mean when your front doors don't open properly. The front towers are close to the firewall and the rear towers are close to the moderately stiff trunk bulkhead. I can see a strut bar on a car where the towers are further away from the firewall such as a Mustang. Purchasing the struts, in my opinion, is more for looks then performance.

If I had $300+ to spend on performace I would buy an Aussie or BAT bar or save for new struts/coils. If your already there then look at the other many engine mods.


Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 326
E
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
E
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 326
I'd stiffen the rear before the front anyday.
but thats just my opinion.


99 Cougar V6 Tourmaline Green: MTX, KKM, Borla Dual...
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,975
C
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
C
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,975
I think I saw in buckshot website something about them welding a bar under the car for more stiffness???


1992 Ford Escort LX-E -Tracer LTS spoiler -GT Grille
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,387
B
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
B
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,387
Subframe connectors would probably yield greater increases in handling than either


98 3.0 svt: Sold
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 131
R
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
R
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 131
the rear bar helped tremendously with the noise and vibration in the car and helped with the handling as well.the front didnt seem to do as much and the sub frames did make the most noticable difference.i installed a cta rear bar, sparco front bar on mine with sho shop subs.


(2)1994 mustang GTs 2001 gt convertible loaded.www.haywoodspeed.com
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,975
C
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
C
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,975
Originally posted by {Kontofosho}:
Subframe connectors would probably yield greater increases in handling than either




Yeah that's what I meant Thanks


1992 Ford Escort LX-E -Tracer LTS spoiler -GT Grille
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  Andy W._dup1, Auto-X Fil 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5