|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 57
CEG\'er
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 57 |
Will a 60-1 with a .68 AR and 4inch inlet make 400whp on a contour svt?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223
"Absolut Rara."
|
|
"Absolut Rara."
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,223 |
60-1 is a little large for a 2.5L
IMHO it would be far from the ideal choice on a contour; many other turbos that would work far better for just about any conceivable application.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 383
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 383 |
I see alot of mustang guys use the 60-1 hifi. 
98CSVT specII yada yada yada
95 Mustang GT
M&M road&track box
HP stage one
60-mm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
60-1 !!
My T3/4 will make 400HP on a contour if the engine can take it. That is around the limits I think, but theoretically I should be able to do it. At the wheels.
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 57
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 57 |
The reason i asked. I saw a Daily driven type r, civic si, and a vr6 use this turbo and made 350-450 @ the wheels. The civic si only had a thicker head gasket with no internal work. He told me that he used this turbo because it came on later than the t3 t4 but a lot stronger on the upper rev band,(less wheel spin on take off). All the guys that used this turbo ran no less than 115 in the 1/4 mile and the fastest was the type r with full interior that ran a 132 with no nos. The vr6 jetta ran a 11.6 @ 128. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,084
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,084 |
11.6 @ 128 does not make sense...thats like low 10 sec trap speeds...
Fifteen men on a dead man's chest...
Maverick Machineworks is open for business!! Tell me what you need and I can make it!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 482
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 482 |
Originally posted by Y2KBlack&BlueSVT:
11.6 @ 128 does not make sense...thats like low 10 sec trap speeds...
but if the big turbo only gives max boost way up high, then shouldnt the MPH seem very high.........some show on speed channel ran a mopar in the 11's and he barely broke 100mph
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 388
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 388 |
Originally posted by Faboo:
Originally posted by Y2KBlack&BlueSVT:
11.6 @ 128 does not make sense...thats like low 10 sec trap speeds...
but if the big turbo only gives max boost way up high, then shouldnt the MPH seem very high.........some show on speed channel ran a mopar in the 11's and he barely broke 100mph
thats probably because he had drag radials and he dead hooked..<<<<."mopar"..high mph is achievable especially if you blow the hell out of your tires coming off the line....128 does seem a little high though.....about that mopar again, are u sure ..my buddy went 13.1 @ 103 in a bone stock ls1..
my .02
2000 t-red SVT
****too quick for civics****
i have a few tricks up my sleeve
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
I hate to say it, but it sounds possible. The front-drive cars suck off the line but they can really accelerate once they have traction.
In my case I ran 14.3 @ 102.5MPH while there was a guy who was running low 13's at about 99 MPH trap speed. I was taking off reasonably easy to baby my transmission, but then nailing it in 2,3 and 4th gears.
warmonger
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10
New CEG\'er
|
|
New CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10 |
Thats exactly the problem traction!! Thats why alot of those guys run bigger turbos and slicks and they are still having traction problems. Imagine a turbo that spools really quick, even less traction especially on a front wheel drive car.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
