|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 131
CEG\'er
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 131 |
I got my 98.5 dynoed for the first time. It is stock, and I did not know what to expect. It dynoed at 129.9hp. I thought it would have been higher. The tourqe did not work because something under my hood was to hot for something to stick. Well thats all I had to say, does anyone else have a stock hp number, I would like to see how close I am to theirs.
1998 svt, 58000km
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 265
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 265 |
i haven't dyno'd mine but that seems damn low for a stock svt. i thought most stock svt's should dyno around 160 or so....
01 Black Honda S2000
99 svt Tred/tan
#2394 of 2760 on July 29, 1999 *SOLD*
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,020
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,020 |
A stock SVT should be about 165 hp, give or take a few.
Either the dyno was messed up or something is seriously wrong with your car.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
I have no life
|
|
I have no life
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653 |
From what I understand, the HP comes from torque divided by something and RPM.... So w/o torque you could not have HP rating. If it was one of those mobile dynos, those are always off.
98.5 SVT
91 Escort GT (almost sold)
96 ATX Zetec (i brake to watch you swerve)
FS: SVT rear sway bar
WTB: Very cheap beater
CEG Dragon Run - October 13-15
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,387
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,387 |
98 3.0 svt: Sold
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 131
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 131 |
Ya it was one of those mobile dyno's. I thought something did not seem right. I know my car is fine, it has 40000km and runs strong.
1998 svt, 58000km
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
I have no life
|
|
I have no life
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653 |
yeah, i saw them dyno a heavily modded rx-7 on one and it showed some seriously low numbers for what he had done. Probably discouraged the guy. The one I saw the guy hooking up the thing asked loudly if the curve was looking right or whatever when he was setting up thing to measure RPMs and what not. Some guy from crowd answered and that's what he went on. 
98.5 SVT
91 Escort GT (almost sold)
96 ATX Zetec (i brake to watch you swerve)
FS: SVT rear sway bar
WTB: Very cheap beater
CEG Dragon Run - October 13-15
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 153
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 153 |
'00 svt #1485/2150
Precision SC6152E .63 a/r, PnP Heads, TiAL 38mm Wastegate, Blitz BOV, HKS EBC, and HKS TT, Koni's Front/Rear, 19" Centerline RPMs, SPEC Stage 5 Clutch and Flywheel, DMD, Intrax, LoTek w/ Water Temp, Oil Press., EGT, Boost Gauge
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,036
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,036 |
My car is a 98 SVT, and it baselined at 163 whp back in 1998. That was on a Dynojet dyno (SHOshop), what kind of dyno was used for yours? Mustang dyno? That new Dynapak where they remove the wheels? Was that number SAE corrected? Are there any factors that could obscure the numbers so badly? Most SVT's are around the 160-170's stock, 170's and up for simple bolt-on's, like an open air filter and a good cat-back exhaust.
dion
98 SVT, 200 whp/190 lb. ft tq (tuned by ADC), 3.0, P&P heads w/2.5L valves, optimized TB, MSDS, SCA 2.5" catback, SHOshop UIM/LIM, underdrive pulley set, TD's, Koni/H&R, BAER/TCE, Progress, CF1 products
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025 |
are you sure your secondaries are opening? might want to check the cats too.
Jim Hahn
1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04
3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
|
|
|
|
|
