|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,867
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,867 |
You're talking about modulation, and yes it varies by pad material (primarily). But how can the pad/rotor interface go to infinite before the tire would normally let it? It's Newton's law. Any torque applied to slowing down the wheel (pad to rotor to wheel to tire) is balanced by the reactive torque coming the other way (road to tire to wheel to rotor). The pad/rotor interface can't go to infinite grip unless the tire is a) at full stop or b) locked and sliding. That a pad/rotor that spikes this way is difficult to modulate to threshold is not at issue. That this spiking behavior changes the tire's total traction capacity (which, I'll grant, might vary slightly based on elasticity) is still in question, at least for me.
Function before fashion.
'96 Contour SE
"Toss the Contour into a corner, and it's as easy to catch as a softball thrown by a preschooler." -Edmunds, 1998
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,228
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,228 |
There's still the tires to consider. Put a narrow, hard compound tire on a car, then put a wide, soft compound tire on the same car. Same brakes - Which car stops shorter?
Put better brakes on the narrow, hard compound car. Does it stop better than the car with Stock brakes and soft compound tires?
Tires are the primary conection with the ground, so they are important.
Now brakes. A driver with the same relative skills can stop shorter if the car's brakes are more easily modulated than if less easy. So brakes make a difference too.
There is a previous thread on this that goes a step further. The ABS systems are tuned to stock brakes and tires. There is a possibility of more braking distance by the ABS system with otherwise better than stock components because of the programming mismatch.
ALso, for more fuel in this fire, the suspension and brake geometry can affect braking distance too. Worn struts/shocks can cause the wheel to bounce off the ground, increasing braking distance. So better suspension components, alignment, bushings all contribute to braking distance too.
So, tires, brakes, driver,suspension, ABS system, all contribute to braking distance directly. They all interact with each other.
My name is Richard. I was a Contouraholic.
NOW: '02 Mazda B3000 Dual Sport, Black
BEFORE: '99 Contour SE Sport
Duratec ATX Spruce Green
PIAA 510's, Foglight MOD, K&N Drop-in
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,399
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,399 |
Wow, post one response citing this GRM article, and look what happens  Honestly folks, the CSVT brakes are way better than most cars, and could do the job very effectively with good tires and pads. Unless you are racing, you don't need the huge rotors with six pot aluminum calipers. It will stop your brakes from fading on the track, but for the street (my two cents here) they are pure overkill. Unless you are doing it for looks, which is cool too. Most of the time the reason for the ever-increasing rotor sizes on production cars is a giant pi$$ing contest: "We have better brakes because our rotors are bigger." As the debate here has shown, it isn't that cut and dried. heck even ford made the concession that swept area was not as important as we might think when they went to the smaller pad on the later CSVTs. Brakes stop just as well, probably even better with the slightly stiffer E1 shock valving. It also comes back to a personal PHILosophy I hold true to whenever possible: If you buy quality parts, and install them correctly, you can't go wrong.
98 Silver Frost SVT
97 BMW 540I Sport, six speed
"Blue is for sky, black is for soil, and white is for simplicity, purity and hope for the future"
"A coveted car should never stunt your life, but should make it more rich and interesting."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 383
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 383 |
There is no pissing contest with brakes ouside the supercar realm. The reason brakes are getting bigger in general is because cars are getting heavier every year. Heavier cars need bigger brakes to have the same braking performance as a lighter car with smaller brakes. Now if you take that smaller car and put bigger brakes on it...forget it, what's the point of repeating myself again.
And no, swept area doesn't have a lot to do with it. Hell, a lot of the big brake systems leave a lot of rotor face untouched and it's all good, because the important part is the effective lever provided by the pad against a large-diameter rotor. s
Pacific Green '96 Contour LX V6
â??98 GTP, light mods, 14.66/94
Calypso Green '92 Mustang LX coupe, 13.56/101
Crown Autocross Club 1999 Street Tire Champion, 2000/2001/2002 Street Modified Champion
KCR SCCA 2002 Solo II Street Modified Champion
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,163
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,163 |
guess I wll sat away from the bat brake rotor and cap upgrades and just stick with better pads and keep my fluid line clean
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 682
Veteran CEG\'er
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 682 |
Originally posted by RogerB: The advantage of discs over drums is cooling/fade resistance.
If I'm experiencing disappointing fade resistance, are my GL rear drums a big part of the problem? I would think not, since I think the great majority of the heat is generated in the front brakes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,693
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,693 |
You need the SVT caliper bracket and rotor conversion. The bigger rotors will do wonders for keeping the brakes cooler. You must have 15" or bigger factory wheels to clear the bigger rotors. Your spare will not fit on the front wheels with the bigger rotors.
Jim Johnson
98 SVT
03 Escape Limited
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 65
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 65 |
Originally posted by Phil Rohtla: Wow, post one response citing this GRM article, and look what happens Honestly folks, the CSVT brakes are way better than most cars, and could do the job very effectively with good tires and pads. Unless you are racing, you don't need the huge rotors with six pot aluminum calipers.
Actually, IMHO, the braking system on the CSVT is it's weakest point. Now, as far as this thread has been going, it's been about the lock-up point and threshold braking. I think braking performance is best determined by the ability to provide fade-free stops consistently. I think Roger and I have discussed this before, but even though the Big rotor kits weigh more, the increased surface area and heat dissipation are more helpful in providing less fade. And as far as drilling/slotting...better off without it. And that's my $.02
JasonS
2000 SVT #1119
Go: SHOshop Intake & y-pipe, Brullen exhaust,
Eibach springs, EBC TurboGroove rotors,
Corbeau seat, TRW 5pt Harness
Show: Knauberized, Clear corners
|
|
|
|
|