Register Log In

Contour Enthusiasts Group Archives Forums Modifications Duratec Performance G-tech or crush bends which is worse?

Print Thread

Page 1 of 2

1

2

G-tech or crush bends which is worse? #482254 11/18/02 03:40 PM
Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 33 F Frankiehotdog OP New CEG\'er
OP Frankiehotdog New CEG\'er F Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 33	DEmonSVT says the g-tech is garbage but quotes one on his profile! P.s. He also hates crush bends btw.

Re: G-tech or crush bends which is worse? #482255 11/18/02 04:39 PM
Joined: Apr 2001 Posts: 63 Freehold, NJ, USA F Frank_dup2 CEG\'er
Frank_dup2 CEG\'er F Joined: Apr 2001 Posts: 63 Freehold, NJ, USA	You seem to be the only person here enjoying this one-man pissing contest. So please end the mental masturbation and get on with things... 2003 Mustang GT 5-Speed, FMS 4.10 gears, Dr. Gas O/R X-pipe, Flowmaster cat-back, BBK CAI, C&L intake plenum, Accufab 75mm TB, Steeda Timing Adjuster - 13.70@102.23 (SOLD) 2000 Cougar V6 ATX with many mods - 15.93@86.97

Re: G-tech or crush bends which is worse? #482256 11/18/02 05:27 PM
Joined: May 2002 Posts: 1,379 Taylor, Michigan S SVTMike_dup1 Hard-core CEG\'er
SVTMike_dup1 Hard-core CEG\'er S Joined: May 2002 Posts: 1,379 Taylor, Michigan	A little advice. If you want people here to respect you; then dont come here as a new CEGer with NO proven prior knowledge of Duratech V6 and try to put down someone who is known for being one of the most knowledgable persons on this site. I think I speak for everyone when I say--If it's a flame war your looking for then take your posts elsewhere. ~~~~~~Mike~~~~~~ Black 2006 VW Rabbit Silver 2000 Contour SVT - SOLD ~~~~The Car~~~~~

Re: G-tech or crush bends which is worse? #482257 11/18/02 06:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 33 F Frankiehotdog OP New CEG\'er
OP Frankiehotdog New CEG\'er F Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 33	I did get pissed because I went to Demon looking for advice and he was a bit harsh. Your right ,I'll lay off. Enjoy the forum guys! Back's better and I won't have much time home anyways.

Re: G-tech or crush bends which is worse? #482258 11/18/02 07:26 PM
Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 211 Pa. T TommyBoy_dup1 CEG\'er
TommyBoy_dup1 CEG\'er T Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 211 Pa.	Originally posted by Frankiehotdog: I did get pissed because I went to Demon looking for advice and he was a bit harsh. Your right ,I'll lay off. Enjoy the forum guys! Back's better and I won't have much time home anyways. Thank goodness, I was getting sick of seeing your ridiculous posts!!!!!!! 1998.5 CSVT #3617 K&N Custom Intake Custom 2 3/4 Magnaflow cat back Ram HD Power Grip Clutch Energy Suspension Inserts Bosch Platnium + Bf-Goodrich G-force radials "KDWS" Alpine deck CDA-7863 Boston mids More to come: Stock Sucks!!!!

Re: G-tech or crush bends which is worse? #482259 11/18/02 08:58 PM
Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 1,977 The "Safest" City in the USA A AirKnight Hard-core CEG'er
AirKnight Hard-core CEG'er A Joined: Jul 2000 Posts: 1,977 The "Safest" City in the USA	Neither are as bad as you. I GOT BOLT-ONS Project 3-Liter FAQ AirKnight's Online!

Re: G-tech or crush bends which is worse? #482260 11/18/02 09:36 PM
Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 97 Alexandria,VA F FWD SVT TUNR CEG\'er
FWD SVT TUNR CEG\'er F Joined: Sep 2002 Posts: 97 Alexandria,VA	Hey FrankieHotDog, this section of contour.org is for DURATEC PERFORMANCE, genius. Post somewhere else. 98 contour SVT 03 focus SVT

Re: G-tech or crush bends which is worse? #482261 11/18/02 09:37 PM
Joined: Sep 2000 Posts: 3,223 Westland, MI R Rara_dup1 "Absolut Rara."
Rara_dup1 "Absolut Rara." R Joined: Sep 2000 Posts: 3,223 Westland, MI	Frankie, I'm not gonna put up w/ people intentionally stirring up crap. If you have a technical point relative to the forum, make it, otherwise leave. Balance is the Key. rarasvt@comcast.net

Re: G-tech or crush bends which is worse? #482262 11/18/02 09:55 PM
Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 509 Muskegon, Michigan, USA R rollingstash_dup1 Veteran CEG\'er
rollingstash_dup1 Veteran CEG\'er R Joined: Feb 2001 Posts: 509 Muskegon, Michigan, USA	Demon quotes a G-tech for his 60 foot time . His quarter mile time however is quoted from KCIR, which I believe is Kansas City International Speedway. Indeed the way he has it posted on his profile is confusing. The point I am sure he was trying to make was, the G-tech is not accurate for comparison from car to car, but is a decent way to judge improvements in performance from modification and to get a notalltogether accurate guage of your car's overall performance. As far as you getting in a pissing match, I acted like a 14 year old at one time too. Mellow out man. don't drink and drive.

You're worse. #482263 11/18/02 10:01 PM
Joined: Sep 2000 Posts: 9,602 KC, MO D DemonSVT_dup1 Hard-core CEG'er
DemonSVT_dup1 Hard-core CEG'er D Joined: Sep 2000 Posts: 9,602 KC, MO	Originally posted by Frankiehotdog: DEmonSVT says the g-tech is garbage but quotes one on his profile! P.s. He also hates crush bends btw. You'd think you might notice the foot note saying the 1/4 mile is done at the POS local track here and I'll gladly give you a link to my old dyno run (187+HP/169TQ) that was before headers, UIM, LIM, S-AFC, etc... Also when testing with a G-tech you need to do atleast 3 runs - BOTH ways (6 runs total min) and average your times. Not just take the best time pointed down hill! I never said the G-tech was garbage. Just a guesstimator and a decent one if used properly (which 95% of the people DO NOT do) It's great for self tuning and datalogging & definitely not very great for comparing against other people. Heck even comparing track times is not very accurate considering every track is differently setup, elevations, temp & humidity, etc... Oh & I do hate crush bends. 2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.

Page 1 of 2

1

2

Moderated by GTO Pete

Link Copied to Clipboard

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5