Folks
Your choice of exhaust system that you choose is of your own. I am not here to push you to buying a CTA exhaust system or any particular system. Of course we are going to use our own system on our own vehciles before using any one elses. It's our own best interest.
The discussion was of mandrel bent systems versus crush bent systems and whether crush bent systems would gain over stock mandrel bent systems. I don't recall the discussion being about the exact amount of hp gains. Whether it be 3 hp or 5 or 7 hp, etc, the fact remains that on both vehicles, the 2 1/2" crush bent systems gained power over the previous exhaust systems. Dyno runs are a funny creature, as even from run to run on the same day, within the same 1/2 hour, the values can vary and with no changes made between runs. The dyno runs are used as a guide to whether your mods are increasing power or decreasing power. Average out the numbers of the runs of a particular day and compare it to the newer runs, the fact remains that gains were seen with the install of the 2 1/2 crush bent system on both vehicles.
Everyone has an opinion, and that is their right, if you believe in mandrel, so be it. Some customers seek affordability and custom mandrel bending can be costly. If our exhaust shop had a mandrel bender, don't you think we would have them build our systems that way???
If the discussion is of the total gains of mandrel bent to crush bent system, of equal size, same mufflers, same tips, etc, then that is another chapter. No dispute there. I think you already know the conclusion.
On another note Run's 9 and 12, the same chip was used. It was reprogrammed for Run 9 but was unchanged for Run 12.
We have seen other tests from other local customers vehicles, with and without a UR crank pulley installed. The peak gains were minimal if not negligable, though the engine wind up was a heck of a lot quicker, so the UR pulley was considered a non change on our SE, as so stated, only change by Run 12. I suppose we should have been more specific in stating that minimal peak gain with addition of UR pulley.
Also, when using the dynojet viewer, depending on the comparison scale, time, speed or rpm, the actual values on the graph may vary.
Here is a more "accurate" depiction of the SE runs. No smoothing of the curves, numbers are SAE corrected.