|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 31
New CEG\'er
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 31 |
How many of you have one own your SVT and did help out pretty good already have kkm intake and aussie pipe. but just seeing if will help out or not and i think stock is 60mm right.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860 |
2001 Lincoln LS8
1994 Lexus GS300
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025 |
Originally posted by Keyser:
Stick with the 60.
suppose we went with your turbo, would the 65mm be a better choice then?
Jim Hahn
1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04
3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860 |
I wish I could call the turbo mine.  I'm using the 60mm right now.
2001 Lincoln LS8
1994 Lexus GS300
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,516
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,516 |
How great is the HP loss for the 65MM???
Mazda 6S, V6, Speed Yellow
5 Speed, Sport package
Bose audio
Painted 'stash and HIDs!
w/Injen 1/4 14.750 @ 94.94
Former car:
99 Contour SE Sport Black MTX V6
SVT plastic...
1/4 - 15.012 @ 90.58 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by mmarfan:
How great is the HP loss for the 65MM???
Both lightly and Moderately modified SVT's lost power with it. (Dyno tested) Anything less modified would lose power to an even greater extent.
Even I lost power with it until my latest round of modifications.
There have been some well modified to high modified SVT's that had A/F tunability make good power with it. (180's range) No comparisson dyno vs a 60mm though.
My suggestion is to skip this mod or at least save it until you are very highly modded and have A/F tunability.
I can tell you the butt dyno is a definite liar with this mod! I thought is was awesome until I went to the track and tested it. It was significantly slower & lower trap speed then the 60mm. I made 187/169 at the time and it lost power for me.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025 |
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by mmarfan:
How great is the HP loss for the 65MM???
I made 187/169 at the time and it lost power for me.
that must be a shame only making about 190 hp, AFTER it lost power!  i can only hope i can break 160!
Jim Hahn
1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04
3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,516
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,516 |
LOL anyone wanna trade?? I have a 65mm coming in and was originally looking for an SVT TB.
Mazda 6S, V6, Speed Yellow
5 Speed, Sport package
Bose audio
Painted 'stash and HIDs!
w/Injen 1/4 14.750 @ 94.94
Former car:
99 Contour SE Sport Black MTX V6
SVT plastic...
1/4 - 15.012 @ 90.58
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,516
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,516 |
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by mmarfan:
How great is the HP loss for the 65MM???
Both lightly and Moderately modified SVT's lost power with it. (Dyno tested) Anything less modified would lose power to an even greater extent.
Even I lost power with it until my latest round of modifications.
There have been some well modified to high modified SVT's that had A/F tunability make good power with it. (180's range) No comparisson dyno vs a 60mm though.
My suggestion is to skip this mod or at least save it until you are very highly modded and have A/F tunability.
I can tell you the butt dyno is a definite liar with this mod! I thought is was awesome until I went to the track and tested it. It was significantly slower & lower trap speed then the 60mm. I made 187/169 at the time and it lost power for me.
Thought about something Demon...Because it feels faster might mean it is faster, on the dyno the car is sitting there, but on the track the air is getting shoved in to the air filter, mabee possibaly lessining the tumbling effect that happens.  Just a thought.... 
Mazda 6S, V6, Speed Yellow
5 Speed, Sport package
Bose audio
Painted 'stash and HIDs!
w/Injen 1/4 14.750 @ 94.94
Former car:
99 Contour SE Sport Black MTX V6
SVT plastic...
1/4 - 15.012 @ 90.58
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by mmarfan:
Thought about something Demon...Because it feels faster might mean it is faster, on the dyno the car is sitting there, but on the track the air is getting shoved in to the air filter, mabee possibaly lessining the tumbling effect that happens. Just a thought....
I'm saying that my butt dyno felt more power, but in real world testing it dropped noticeable power. Others have "statically" tested it on a dyno and had power loss as well. The reference to 187/169 was showing how well modified my car was and it still lost power for me in "real world" driving. I would only recommend it to highly modified SVT's with A/F tunability and any 3L.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
