|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 81
CEG\'er
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 81 |
just wondering what the differences are from zetecs and vtecs..i popped my friends hood on his civic Si, and they do look damn close to being related.
guys?
Teal|'95 'Tour GL|75k|
16V 2.0|Rebuilt ATX|
Factory Euro Mod's (Ordered in Dec '94 From Holland)-|Larger Radiator, Oil pan, Fan, Tank..little things make a difference|
Lots of mods to come....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,465
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,465 |
2003 Subaru WRX some mods
Even if you don't have the answer, you certainly have to admire the problem.
aka ZetecRacing
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 279
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 279 |
yep, four cylinders/four cylinders, fuel injection/fuel injection, DOHC/DOHC...they're damn near brothers I'd say!!  I wish we had an archive of the last CEG.  We talked about this quite a bit in a topic not so long ago.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 368
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 368 |
Honda's design/method/computer tech is much more advanced than any zetec design. Why do you think Honda is the reigning champ when it comes to N/A, hp to liter ratio when compared to performance vehicles of other manufacters. Tell when you cam across a Ford 4-Cylinder from the factory that made 120bhp per Liter Naturally Aspirated, Never, and it will probably never happen. Honda Racing Technology is just a bit more advanced. Don't get me wrong though I love my Fords and can even have a ZETEC Motor built up for any of you, that'll make those kinds of numbers  CK my post .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 81
CEG\'er
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 81 |
well..the only motor that gets as many parts/mods for it, is the focus..so maybe thats the closest competition to a vtec?
Teal|'95 'Tour GL|75k|
16V 2.0|Rebuilt ATX|
Factory Euro Mod's (Ordered in Dec '94 From Holland)-|Larger Radiator, Oil pan, Fan, Tank..little things make a difference|
Lots of mods to come....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 120
CEG\'er
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 120 |
There is a big difference between the ZETEC and VTEC. The main difference is valve timing and w/ i-VTEC they also control cam timing. Honda has the upper hand when it comes to high performance engines. When you can have a 1.6L engine produce 160hp and 111 ft.-lbs. of torque stright from the factory floor you are doing a great job. Also think that these engines came out in the late 80's early 90's. Now do take me wrong, I love my ZETEC with all it's torque.The only reason I envy the Honda engines is the ablitity to change valve timimg during high revolution operation. If our engines had this feature, we would be something the f*@$ with.
Officer, I wasn't speeding. I was qualifying.
1998 Mystique
Mods coming very soon.(Only had car about 9 months)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,857
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,857 |
Originally posted by wattspxr: Honda's design/method/computer tech is much more advanced than any zetec design. Why do you think Honda is the reigning champ when it comes to N/A, hp to liter ratio when compared to performance vehicles of other manufacters.
Tell when you cam across a Ford 4-Cylinder from the factory that made 120bhp per Liter Naturally Aspirated, Never, and it will probably never happen. Honda Racing Technology is just a bit more advanced.
Don't get me wrong though I love my Fords and can even have a ZETEC Motor built up for any of you, that'll make those kinds of numbers CK my post .
the answer is that ford is making big power w n/a v8's and apparently they don't care to spend their time trying to make more hp per liter on a 4 cyl. than honda...who cares about hp per liter when the total output is only making 160 hp??? ford's cobra motor is making about 87 hp per liter itself,and i don't think that low tech...and that motor makes over 300 n/a hp....so i'd take the total hp over hp per liter anyday...just my $.02...the honda vtec is the most overated motor there is,who cares how much hp per liter you have when you are getting your a$$ handed to you by an even slightly larger motor.. and if svt is getting 170 hp out of the zetec,then all you zetec guys have hope of building a higher hp motor also.. and if you check out the july car+driver you will see that the focus svt handed the world famous vtec its a$$ in their shootout...
new,new ride!
'99 svt
black/mnb
'95 mustang gt sold!
'98 svt #800 sold!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,023
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,023 |
111 ft-lbs. of torque is nothing to be proud of. Yes their cam-changing VVT is a pretty nice design and the HP is good above 4,500RPM, but the added complexity would add cost and the V6 would become more practical in our cars. And you would have some much better torque with 6.  Stick to turbo Zetec...
-Giovanni
One turbocharger. Two intercoolers. All love.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,857
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,857 |
new,new ride!
'99 svt
black/mnb
'95 mustang gt sold!
'98 svt #800 sold!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,301
Addicted CEG\'er
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,301 |
Not to mention most Honda motors dont make any power until you rev the hell out of it. My buddy has an older Civic Si, and there is absolutely no feeling of acceleration, it revs all day, but has no real get-up-and-go. Hp/L is great, but its TORQUE that gets you moving. But you guys already know that
-Ken V.
1998.5 SE Praire Tan Zetec ATX
psycho_bass@hotmail.com
Roush springs Roush rear sway bar BAT struts 17" Millie Miglia HT3 and a ton of subtle asthetic mods
|
|
|
|
|