|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15
New CEG\'er
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15 |
well i have been using the stock TB for the past month and a bit, because the mustang TB does not bolt up to the non SVT UIM at ALL
after spending a few hours modifying it i finally have it on there and working, a big improvment over stock, and with the ported out TB opening on the UIM, it really sucks
but it was not easy by any stretch of the imagination, i had to scavenge a spring off my old TB to use with this one, because the spring on the new one is reversed, and right now the cable is being wired up to the TB lever with wire cause there is nowhere to slip it on
will post pics tommorow, looks pretty sweet.. broke off some idle control thing in the process though, will post pics of that too cause it is throwing a code and screwing up my idle, not sure how to fix it..
will also get my car dynoed soon, never dynoed before hope to hit some decent numbers and tune my AFC
1995 SE
V6 MTX
65mmTB, true dual exhaust, kkm intake, apexi-Safc, 70hp Nitrous Oxide, H&R/KYB,17" ace spades, tint, phantom grip LSD, Luk performance clutch
*rip 1998 svt silverfrost september 11 2001*
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,168
I am Canuckian
|
|
I am Canuckian
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,168 |
I thought this affected low end power negatively, no?
Green 96 mystique gs 4cyl mtx
16.9 in the 1/4 mile @102500 miles
95SE in Midnight Red MTX
MSDS headers and y-pipe
SVT exhaust
SVT UIM
Optimized se TB.
Full pre 98 SVT body kit
15.741 @ 87.73mph :)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by mbb41:
I thought this affected low end power negatively, no?
Actually it has shown losses on the dyno on even moderately modified SVT's. If I were you Kris I'd get a before and after dyno. When I put it on last fall it felt like a million bucks. It slowed my car down a lot in reality. I was quite modified (& an SVT to boot) at the time.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
I have no life
|
|
I have no life
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197 |
I installed the SVT TB on my SE and it felt bogged low. It did feel stronger up high but it wasn't worth it for me.
-'96 SE MTX 3L
-'98 SVT 1,173 of 6,535
-'05 Mazda 6s, loaded, g/f's ride
-Need a 96-00 manual on CD? PM or email me
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 115
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 115 |
Originally posted by todras:
I installed the SVT TB on my SE and it felt bogged low. It did feel stronger up high but it wasn't worth it for me.
I have an otimized SVT TB sitting in my garage, I tried to put on it and it wasn't a direct bolt on so it sits. How did you get yours to work? I got with some other stuff and it was cheap, so I never really looked into it, but now that I'm being reminded, and winter is comming..
98 Black Mystique ATX/Duratec
"Mystique, the luxury SVT"
P.S.- This is what part of the alphabet would look like if the letters Q and R were eliminated....
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15
New CEG\'er
|
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 15 |
i will have to take pics to show you what i did todras, its not all that pretty but it works, yeah not a direct bolt on for non svt manifolds
1995 SE
V6 MTX
65mmTB, true dual exhaust, kkm intake, apexi-Safc, 70hp Nitrous Oxide, H&R/KYB,17" ace spades, tint, phantom grip LSD, Luk performance clutch
*rip 1998 svt silverfrost september 11 2001*
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 115
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 115 |
You think you could post those pics on here?
98 Black Mystique ATX/Duratec
"Mystique, the luxury SVT"
P.S.- This is what part of the alphabet would look like if the letters Q and R were eliminated....
|
|
|
|
|
