Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
#407498 03/12/02 12:51 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 443
R
Member
Offline
Member
R
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 443
Quote:
Originally posted by 1Sick_Puppy:
What is the diff between an Eaton unit and the one by Kenne Bell?
Kenne Bell uses Whipple superchargers in his kits. Whipple twist's the rotors in the blowers on a much steeper helix than Eaton does, However Eaton superchargers are also a twisted helix design only not as much twist. Hope this helps. smile

#407499 03/12/02 01:02 AM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
Quote:
Originally posted by Rara:
no offense bret, but Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords is hardly an ideal source for technical information, lol.

fwiw, the lobes on the modern eaton blowers are also "twisted" to be more screw-like, though not to the extent of the ones that kenne bell uses.
oh yeah... lol, that is where i read that about the kenne bell vs eaton.

i was gonna say the same thing about eaton being rock solid as far as reliability...

still... the kenne bell unit does run considerably cooler then the eaton does at the same rpm.


i am offically a troll... so take my information and advice with a grain of salt.

08/15/2001 - 11/05/2001 : 1999 Ford Contour SVT : 170fwhp - 147.9 fwtq
07/17/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Roush Mustang GT Stage 1
11/05/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning
#407500 03/12/02 01:04 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 443
R
Member
Offline
Member
R
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 443
Quote:
Originally posted by Rara:
Quote:
Originally posted by 1Sick_Puppy:
[b]What is the diff between an Eaton unit and the one by Kenne Bell?
not a whole lot in concept, the lobes on the kenne bell blowers are "twisted" more to make it more like a screw, hence the nick of "screw-type"

I have seen some empirical evidence that the units Kenne bell uses are a bit more efficient than a comparable size eaton, but I have yet to run across any indisputable test results. On the plus side for eaton, they have a rock solid reputation for durability.[/b]
I couldnt agree with you more about rock solid durability of the Eatons. They are solid as a rock, thats why I like them so much. 3 of my freinds put whipples on their vehicals, 2 PT Cruisers and 1 Chevy dualy truck. All 3 had some pretty sizable issues with there kits that took several months to work out, and the Cruisers are still having some small problems. I'd rather not go through all that. So for me its Eaton. smile

#407501 03/12/02 02:10 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 443
R
Member
Offline
Member
R
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 443
Quote:
Originally posted by woz:
Jusk to keep the facts in line smile also the owner of the intrgra in question wanted me to post the below comments laugh

Thats to bad about your buddies SC install. He should have gotten a kit from Endyn, there cheaper and from the sound of it create far more performance than he got. wink [/QUOTE]

That would be nice except that ...

(a) there is no such thing as the Endyn supercharger. There's only one, hand built prototype in existence, on a 1989 Civic si 1.5 SOHC. It's a monster though.

(b) cheap is relative. All the bits n pieces to support a 400+ whp FWD car safely will easily run you $15K (trans, brakes, suspension, etc).

(c) some other dood on the Forced Induction Integra board sent his entire engine + Jackson supercharger to Endyn to build it to hell (forged pistons, pNp head, Eagle rods, reworked Eaton SC, etc. Long story short: At 17 psi and $10K later, it barely runs better than it did at 11 psi.[/QB][/QUOTE]
(A) I never said there was a Endyn supercharger. Larry uses Eaton superchargers in his kits, of course he does some work on them. The prototype you refer to is one of Larry's testmules its a car not a supercharger, there are several other testmules as well. (B)Thats interesting. {C} That dood on the Integra board should contact Endyn and express his displeasure with there service and products. Endyn has a policy that if your not satisfied and there products dont perform as advertised you get your money back. I've never had any problems with them, but then again I'm just one person. smile

#407502 03/12/02 07:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 945
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 945
Quote:
Originally posted by Rara:
an M90 would be far more appropriate, one from an older T-bird supercoupe could prolly be adapted. It has been done before, even by ford, though only on Concept vehicles, IIRC the older Profile concept had an eaton blower on it (ask Terry, he would know about this car) snd the more recent cougar eliminator (trick setup on this car) had one as well.
Huh..the T-bird SC's are pretty cheap if you go used. That might be a viable solution if fabricating the brackets and other materials is available. I am still going to assume that hood clearance would still be an issue.


joshua_drew@hotmail.com
AIM "nerdsalot2"
*************************
1998.5 Black Contour SVT
1998 ZJ Limited 4.0L AWD
#407503 03/14/02 02:20 AM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 212
C
Member
Offline
Member
C
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 212
take a look at the cuogar eliminater it used a roots blower mounted were the battery is with a custom adapter. and that was on a 3.0l as well.


98 silver frost SVT
custom built intake, offroad y-pipe,mystery mod,remote optimizer,short shifter,zex nitrous, lots of stereo, 17 konigs

with paradas.(bent) TOTALED do to freak electrical fire?(that started at a wireing harness ford neglected to tell me should have been recalled as they did with the 95se) I miss this car.

NEW PROFFESSION AS A TROLL.

new car. 2000 dodge dakota 4.7l v8. custombuilt intake, custom exhaust, kennebell pcm, and electric fan conversion, 180 stat, 3.55 pegleg, my old stereo system, 17x7 billets and 255-50 nitto 450 tires. next drop and traction adders. g-tech 14.5

in search of 95 se fivespeed to hang contourparts on.
#407504 03/14/02 05:48 AM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
uhm... a roots blower bolts on to the lower intake manifold and runs directly off the FEAD... how could u put it anywhere but "on top" of the engine?


i am offically a troll... so take my information and advice with a grain of salt.

08/15/2001 - 11/05/2001 : 1999 Ford Contour SVT : 170fwhp - 147.9 fwtq
07/17/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Roush Mustang GT Stage 1
11/05/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning
#407505 03/14/02 02:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 945
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 945
I thought they can go anywhere as long as the drive pulley is aligned with the crank. By having it over near the battery does not sound like it's near the crank.


joshua_drew@hotmail.com
AIM "nerdsalot2"
*************************
1998.5 Black Contour SVT
1998 ZJ Limited 4.0L AWD
#407506 05/28/02 06:33 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,848
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,848
I was just going to say, hasn't anyone heard of or seen the Cougar eliminator!?

bret it works the same way as the vortec, except it's a roots type SC. Basically some custom plumbing to get the air into the uim. I don't think it makes much of a difference whether or not the blower is on top of the motor, as long as the air gets there.

Hopefully some people will copy what's been done with the cougar, really cool stuff


1999 Silver Frost SVT
#609 of 2760
Born on 12/3/98

KKM Intake
Removed Resonator
35% Window Tint all around
Tinted Tail Lights
ElKy Mesh Grilles
HID

Dyno'ed at 175.3HP/155.5TQ

"How much must I live through just to get away..."
#407507 07/06/02 07:06 PM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3
P
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
P
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3
i dont realy think the r&d cost would be that high. not any highet than developing a turbo kit, and that has been done. i believe it is just a matter of someone taking the plunge and deciding to do it. i believe that mounting it on top of the engine is the best route. the hood is the real problem here. i am not an expert by any means though. keep in mind that the eliminator cougar was put together to look almost stock from the outside and to use a basicly stock engine set up. also they are running alot higher boost levels than has been applied to our cars yet so the internals have been upgraded to handle it. but i still think that with mild amounts of boost this could be done for about the same price as the turbo kit.


2000 cougar atx, sho shop y pipe, pace setter exhaust, 80mm maf, eibach springs, superchip, konis, 22mm rear sway bar, omp front strut tower brace, 17" enikie cdr9 wheels, nitto tires, much more to come
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5