Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,848
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,848
don't police interceptors have more agressive shift pstterns than a regular crown vic? Not saying it'll make it hang with a marauder but im just wondering.


1999 Silver Frost SVT
#609 of 2760
Born on 12/3/98

KKM Intake
Removed Resonator
35% Window Tint all around
Tinted Tail Lights
ElKy Mesh Grilles
HID

Dyno'ed at 175.3HP/155.5TQ

"How much must I live through just to get away..."
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,598
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,598
Quote:
Originally posted by TheGreatOne:
don't police interceptors have more agressive shift pstterns than a regular crown vic? Not saying it'll make it hang with a marauder but im just wondering.
Even if they do, the Marauder has a higher stall and more agressive tranny programming than the standard fair 'vic and Grand Marquis...


\'94 Cobra #4963/5009, black on black, not quite stock
Formerly owned a black '00 SVT, #1972
Join the SVTOA!
RIP - Ray "Old Fart Emeritus" McNairy
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 14
C
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
C
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 14
I have an older police interceptor and I am seriously considering a Marauder.

The 4.6 16valve 2 cam motor standard to the interceptor is nothing special and is essentially stock.

Dual exhaust and slight ECU tweaks account for the slight hp difference over the stock crown Vic. Oil and tranny coolers are the only add ons. Acceleration is sometimes worse over stock with a higher final drive to help high speed acceleration (mine is an absurd 2.73)There are tweaks to the transmission valve body to reduce wear.

The interceptor. Never was considered a rocket (8.42sec to 60 MPH and a top speed of 129) The 2003 model actually tests out slower at 127mph than the 2002 model. Please reference "Michigan State Police Tests 2002 Patrol Vehicles"
http://www.nlectc.org/testing/vehicles.html and specifically:
http://www.nlectc.org/pdffiles/msp2002bulletin.pdf

All police cars and the marauder are speed limited by the computer primarily due to the temp rating of the tires. On my car, an '88 MA state police interceptor 5.8W with World products heads (197cc intake ports with 2.02 valves),cam, roller rockers, big manifold, headers, no cats, and a 4 barrel, no computer (removed), and no speed limiter,all tweaked for this 3800lbs car. having tried, I can tell you there is no way that I could reach 140mph. It is all a matter of hp (nearly 400) vs. wind resistance.

The Marauder with the 4 cam 32 valve heads, unique exhaust headers, The larger intake and throttle body is good for 300 or so HP, To say the car is slower than the Crown Vic sport or interceptor is just silly. :rolleyes:

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,585
A
APT Offline
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,585
You guys can wave al lthe BS flags you want. I read an article in one of the rag mags that tested the Marauder and only got 0-60 in 7.5s, quarter mile in 15.2. They mentioned that low end torque was lacking (DOHC motor - duh). I'll check which mag tonight at home.

Aaron

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 26
G
Junior Member
Offline
Junior Member
G
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 26
This guy first tells us the Marauder sucks. And then in the next post tries to sell us Interceptors. Hmmm, conflict of interest?

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,847
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,847
Quote:
Originally posted by APT:
You guys can wave al lthe BS flags you want. I read an article in one of the rag mags that tested the Marauder and only got 0-60 in 7.5s, quarter mile in 15.2. They mentioned that low end torque was lacking (DOHC motor - duh). I'll check which mag tonight at home.

Aaron
So, let's see, it's a full second faster to 60 than the interceptor, and about that again in the 1/4. And we are supposed to believe that the performance is the same? Am I missing something here? I wish my Interceptor hit 60 in 7.5.... eek


"When I take action, I'm not going to fire a $2 million missile at a $10 empty tent and hit a camel in the butt. It's going to be decisive." - President George W. Bush

95 Contour SE ATX V6
"Cracked" Secondaries
DMD Installed
SVT Brakes
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,585
A
APT Offline
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,585
Not at all, Sandman. The test article did mention the the vehicle was a pre-production model. My point is that everyone is getting defensive about bench racing the Marauder and some people have witnessed it getting different results than expected. Wait until the production models hit the streets and then determine. All signs point to the new hot rod being much quicker than the police interceptor Crown Vic, but I have yet to hear (hearsay - third hand) anyone impress me with results out of one.

Aaron

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,847
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,847
And I cannot accept that any dealership would allow such an exclusive automobile to be drag raced on the streets. The liability issues alone are the stuff of nightmares. Until he produces timeslips, I call BS.


"When I take action, I'm not going to fire a $2 million missile at a $10 empty tent and hit a camel in the butt. It's going to be decisive." - President George W. Bush

95 Contour SE ATX V6
"Cracked" Secondaries
DMD Installed
SVT Brakes
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,585
A
APT Offline
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,585
I can accept that.

July 2002 Car & Driver page 85 is the aticle

1/4 mile 15.5 @ 91mph top speed 117mph limited to avoid driveshaft vibration according to the article. Only 1500 miles on the car and trans shifted 100rpm lower than redline which is only 6100rpm (low compared to the 7000rpm Cobra variant).

Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,770
V
Member
Offline
Member
V
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,770
Quote:
Originally posted by APT:
1/4 mile 15.5 @ 91mph top speed 117mph limited to avoid driveshaft vibration
I forgot about that part. WTF? frown

Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5