|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,539
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,539 |
A few days ago I studied a few autocross results throughout the country. The first was a CenDiv event in Peru, Indiana. The second, a Detroit event.
The CenDiv divisional event was well-attended by national contenders. Below note how the D Stock and E stock winners compared to the winning G Stock Integra Type R.
97 Integra Type R 121.449 G Stock 85 CRX............119.542 E Stock 95 Neon ACR.......122.031 D Stock 01 Sube Impreza...124.319 STS 2nd(Jack Burns) 89 Civic Si.......123.530 STS 1st
Note that all these cars except the Type R move to G Stock next year with us. The 2 STS cars certainly had suspension mods but no race tires like the stock cars, yet they were still competitive.
For perspective on how fast a Corvette Z06 is, the first and second place cars had times of 113.697 and 113.783 respectively!!! The winning Honda S2000 did 114.347 in A Stock!
At the Detroit event, more Contours ran than I have ever seen at any other autocross. Times:
1st (non-Contour) 36.408 (WRX I think) 5th Contour 38.43 7th Contour 38.645 15thContour 41.076 18thContour 41.929 19thContour 42.223 25thContour 44.874 (time includes 4 secs for cones) 27 cars in G Stock!!!
Now by comparison, the winning drivers in other classes did:
E Stock 95 Celica ST 36.614 E Stock 200SX SE-R...36.707 D Stock 98 Neon ACR..36.58 STS 01 Sube Impreza (Jack Burns)35.797 F Stock Bullitt Mustang 34.905
Again, the the two E Stock cars, and the D Stock Neons move to G Stock next year and the Impreza remains there...just not the WRX. The Bullitt winner, finished 2nd at last year's nationals in a Cobra but has not faired as well this year in the slower Bullitt. Still a lot faster than us!!!!!
I guess, the point is that driver skill will still be essential to be competitive in G Stock nest year...but at least the light at the end of the tunnel won't be obscured by a Type R or WRX or Eclipse...
Fastest Contour at SZ 2002 Auto-X. 10th in PAX out of 125. CEO of FOGEY(Fast Old Guys Emasculating Young-uns), Inc. Terry Haines, Chairman, Senior V.P.s: (alphabetical)JavaContour, Jet Mech, MFE, SeicoRacing, SVTSTS, Vern Kilburn. If your not a member, yet, wait a few years. I'm not just the CEO, but I'm a member, too. Working with the rank and file to get the job done right!
Historical: 63 TVR (1K in 74), 75 TR-7 (paid cash new), 79 RX-7 (zoom,zoom), 81 RX-7GSL (autobahn-driven),82 Mustang GT (autobahn-driven), 85 Mustang GT (SE Division F Stock Solo II Champ), 86 MR-2 (3rd SE Division D Stock), 88 Civic DX (had 1st born and still owned MR2) 92 Sentra SE-R (all go and no show), 98 EO SVT Contour (FTD SZ 2002). 02 Altima 3.5SE 5 spd!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,585
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,585 |
I have only done a couple SCCA autocrosses, none in the SVT. The last time I drove a 91 Cav Z24 automatic with Yok Intermediates. Took second place to a Probe, although I was always able to drive my Grand Am quicker.
Anyway, it looks like the best times for the other classes are similar, depending on the track. I assume the long one favored high powered cars a lot. I just think there are a lot of good drivers of Neons and Hondas that will make driver skill more important.
The reason I asked about Jack Burns is that my RX-7 has a Jack Burns Race Wheels sticker on the hatch. I know that a former owner used to autocross it, but I don't know much else about the car or her (former owner) history.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 8
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 8 |
Hi, I've never used a Contour for an autocross and was wondering how it is in the events. Recently my Mazda MX6 blew it's engine after an autocross so it was cheaper to get a Contour.
Brian
Brian 1999 Contour SE Sport Not a damn thing done to it yet AIM ID: SCCAMX699
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,061
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,061 |
Go back to the MX-6  j/k, what I'm finding out is that the Contour is a very hard car to drive to it's performance limit. It's not very forgiving of mistakes, they end up costing you a lot of time. Other cars are much easier to drive and sorta lead you in the right direction on how to drive it. The SVT in particular seems to encourage the wrong things to do. (Ohhh that sound.. gotta hear the engine scream...  ) The MX-6 to my understanding is a very easy car to get close to it's performance potential. No surprises and just a secure feeling. The SVT on the other hand is highly sensitive to input and the slightest mistake can bite you in your e.t. It's a hard car to drive but I also think it's a very rewarding car to drive.
Dave Andrews Black&Tan 2000 SVT 225 of 2150 Bassani.. UNCORKED davelandrews@comcast.net "Nothing is so firmly believed as what we least know." -Montaigne
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 8
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 8 |
Thanks for the information. The MX6 was A LOT of fun to drive and was definitely easy to get to it's performance potential. I was so sad when the engine blew. Hopefully what I learned driving that car will help me with the Contour. I guess people won't expect a Contour to do well at an event so it would make it more rewarding to beat everyone with it to suprise them! Peace.
Brian 1999 Contour SE Sport Not a damn thing done to it yet AIM ID: SCCAMX699
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,528
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,528 |
I beg to differ Daveandrews see here. I love my car and think it is easy for a front driver.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,061
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,061 |
Everyone is allowed to disagree.
I've driven a few other FWD cars and quite a few RWD cars. The SVT is not forgiving for little mistakes. The small mistakes don't add up to tenths of a second, rather they add up to seconds. If you look at the first post you will see
5th Contour 38.43 7th Contour 38.645 15thContour 41.076 18thContour 41.929 19thContour 42.223
The first two being very close. The rest being 3 seconds behind in a close group. The driving skill by the first two drivers is very good and then there is a LARGE gap between them and the next few contours. I've let other people drive my car also and they have concurred. They can feel the potential of the car but think it is difficult to take the car to the extreme.
Dave Andrews Black&Tan 2000 SVT 225 of 2150 Bassani.. UNCORKED davelandrews@comcast.net "Nothing is so firmly believed as what we least know." -Montaigne
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 336
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 336 |
iirc, The MX-6 took a GStock championship one year...97, I think. Was the year before the TypeRs came on the scene.
I agree that the contour can be a bit pesky at the limit, but that is also one of its points of endearment for me. I enjoy the learning and the struggle because the fulfillment at the end of it all seems more substantial. In the end, I hope I come out of it as a better driver. Heck, maybe one day I will jump into a TypeR or WRX and just smoke the competition. Dunno. I just love driving my 'tour, whether I am quick or dog slow. I'm getting faster, so I feel I am driving better, which gives me a little more pride in myself, and in my car.
Next year, maybe we'll be more competitive than this (assuming the vote passes). Hopefully I will have the necessary experience under my belt to take advantage of the lack of the Xs and Rs, but I am not going to delude myself into thinking it'll be an easy win. The Celicas are dern qwik, and the Neon can be brought to a 'stock' level that I can only dream about.
It'll be more 'driver' oriented in GStock, imho. I think I will be up for the challenge.
:rolleyes:
We'll see.
The Mark #464 of 6535 A Few GS-ish mods
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,586
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,586 |
You know what I really like is seing the F-bodies and the Mustangs four and five seconds ahead of other cars that are supposed to be handeling machines.
I love that argument put up by the ignorant "ya there fast but they cant handel" Amazing what a little driver skill can do!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 8
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 8 |
Do those of you who autocross a Contour in GS have any exhaust modifications done or shocks or anything? I'm used to driving a car with a lot of pick up off of the turns as a result of an exhaust and I have a feeling the Contour will definitely be no where near what I'm used to. If you do have the modifications, how much difference does it make? Peace.
Brian 1999 Contour SE Sport Not a damn thing done to it yet AIM ID: SCCAMX699
|
|
|
|
|