Originally posted by Todd TCE:
Learn how brakes work. Good reading out there if you want to find it.
You don't need to cover the entire rotor for the brakes to 'work' properly. In fact they'd likely work less if the pad were to be placed the other way. To cover the entire rotor would take about 12 pistons in my mind and one helluva big caliper. That's not how it's done.
How about giving us a quick overview, on how it is done, if it not too much to ask. You are the expert, but here is what I believe. (Any corrections(no flames) would be appreciated)
Braking torque is determined by a few things rotor size, pad pressure on the disc, pad center, and the co-eff of friction between the rotor and the pad(These are inhereint in the pad and the rotor)
Pad Pressure is determined by two things , caliper piston surface area and brake line pressure.
Brake performace (High speed, etc) is determined by rotor+pad heat capacity (this depends quite a bit on rotor mass), and the rotors ability to disappate heat.
So back to larger pads(same calipers).
Larger pads increase surface area on the rotor, but this has no effect on braking performance (only pad and rotor life). So where is the loss? it is that the center point of the pad is further in on the disc (also there is the added warmup time), thereby reducing brake torque.
Larger pad (larger calipers SA)
By increasing the size of the calipers, and accordingly pads, you now have more pad pressure on the disc, and this will (more than) compensate for the inward location of the pad.
So basicly large pad size has very little to do with performance (unless you are running endurance races, which none of us are)
Optimally we would all be running 15+" rotors with 12piston calipers, and also 19" wheels with 8.25" wide tires, and ... but none of us are actually competing in the supertourings races. Even there, the 12 piston calipers are still fairly close to the edge. The only question I have is why they don't turn the un-used rotor area into the best heatsink you can imagine.
Thanks