Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 163
3
Member
Offline
Member
3
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 163
It is a proven fact that the lighter the rotating assembley the FASTER THE CAR WILL ACCELERATE . Now the LOWER THE NUMERICAL GEAR RATIO the bigger the difference it will make . Period. no questions asked. It's just physics. Dustyn is 100% correct when saying that drag racers do not like really light flywheels. Here is the reason why: Momentum. When you launch a car on a set of big slicks you need all the momentum in the world behind the motor when the clutch is released to get the car moving or you are going nowhere. On a street car where you are not going to drop the clutch at 5000rpm to launch it the light flywheel makes a big difference. Now like I said before, the lower the gear ratio numerically the bigger the difference. You are going to notice the biggest difference in 1st gear obviously, 2nd you will notice it, but not as much. 3rd, there won't be much of a difference there so I doubt you'd be able to feel it. If you dyno a car before and after in 1st through 5th gear on a dynojet it will back this up. In fact this is true for any reduction in weight in the driveline. Now the amount of weight, and the amount of leverage (I.E. Diameter of part) are very important here. 5 lbs of weight off of the flywheel are going to make a bigger difference then 5 lbs of weight off of the crank pulley, or the axle. 5 lbs off of a wheel may make just as big a difference or a bigger difference then the flywheel. It depends on where the weight comes off. It may seem that getting a big 1st gear jump in acceleration may not be worth it for the money. But in a drag race the 1st few seconds are everything. Once you get ahead in 1st and 2nd gear the other guy first has to MATCH your speed. Only then can he start to pass you. I have won and lost my fair share of races in 10 years of street racing. The holeshot is everything, unless there is a gross difference in the power level between the cars. There are down sides to driveability with to light of a flywheel to. Rought idle, difficult starts etc. But it dosent sound like this is the case with this unit. I say it was a good purchace. Hope I could help.

Roger


98 SVT E0, Black
Blown motor, help on the way......
97 GTI VR6, Green
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 307
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally posted by Dustyn:
Quote:
Originally posted by abwamo:
[b]I know I have better traction now, BUT all my races before the mods were close on take-offs 1st and 2nd then falling behind in 3rd and 4th gear.
After installing flywheel clutch and Quaife I was slowly gaining on all of my gears.
Cooler: that's not the case here; most of our races were in the winter and spring. This summer we are breaking records for hottest summer it was in the 30°C when we raced at night. I think Hotter or Cooler air will affect both car not just mine, both of us have similar set-ups CAI with K&N filters.
Gas, I was using regular gas (87 Octane) from the same gas station (Petro Canada) that I've been filling from for the past 4 years.
Can you explain why the SVT's were designed with lighter flywheel (3lbs less) than the regular duratecs? My explanation performance gains.

Maybe you had bad luck with your flywheel, but it doesn't mean there is no performance gain. I felt it and proved it by beating my friend.
Maybe it's the whole setup Clutch and Flywheel, I've heard about a lot of people of having problems with aluminium flywheels and stock clutchs. Did you have an aftermarket clutch on your setup?
Ok ask any drag racer what type of flywheel the use and the will tell you steel. It has been proven on stangnet that there are no gains from aluminuim flywheels on the drag strip. I have one of thee heaviest duty clutch you can get. Metallic puck which can be ran with slicks if I wanted. I am not explain myself if you are happy with your 400 dollar cnc machined aluminium that is fine by me. You can aquire close to the same results with a steel flywheel by having it lathed down were it doesn't weigh as much. You can expect gains to an extent with making the mass lighter. If 10 Lb is so much better than 24 why didn't ford just put 10lb flywheels on everything? There has to be a medium between the two weights. If you are happy with your investment thats good. Good luck in your future mods.[/b]
You don't gain HP from this mod (at least I don't think so). It's to help the engine get into it's powerband faster by letting the engine rev faster. You want the engine to rev faster if you're racing ,so you use a lightened flywheel. It's also why I put a custom driveshaft into my '68 GTO and why I'm putting one in my '02 Dakota. Ford didn't do this from the factory b/c it's probably not as reliable, and it would also allow the RPM's to drop to radically for regular street driving.


'99 Contour SE V6 w/MTX (Black Clearcoat)
'02 Dakota 4.7L V8 2WD X-Cab (Flame Red Clearcoat)
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  GTO Pete 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5