|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 20
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 20 |
Hey, I just got a '96 Contour, my first car (woo hoo!). It's got a wimpy 2.0L V4, and I was wondering what the acceleration/horsepower of it was? Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 972
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 972 |
130 HP, even less TQ
0-60: 9-10s 1/4 mile: 18-19s
95 SE Champagne Mettalic True Dual exhaust with X pipe and Redline mufflers KKM Tru Rev intake H&R Springs/KYB struts Apex-i S-AFC 65mm Throttle Body 17" Ace Spades 4 Pt Racing Harness Window Tint all around New Engine @ 117k kilometers G-Tech: 15.6 @ 91.5 MPH
"you officially kick ass" quote from awed CEG'er after i chopped my hood and threw on scoops
RIP 98 SVT silverfrost *nov 4 2001*
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,795
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,795 |
before someone flames you royally the Zetec engine (yours) is a I-4
Every time I come online I wonder if the forums will be up
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 154
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 154 |
it would be cool to see a circle track four in a contique though... Talk about high revs.
95 mystique LS, High Output Cougar S (SVT) 2.5L engine & MTX75
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,950
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,950 |
Originally posted by S\V/T 'Kris': 130 HP, even less TQ
0-60: 9-10s 1/4 mile: 18-19s 125-130HP 130-135TQ 0-60: 8-9s 1/4 mile: 17-18s Don't underestimate the Zetec. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 20
Junior Member
|
OP
Junior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 20 |
Haha, alright so should I take '8-9' and '9-10' and just say 8-10 seconds 0-60?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 816
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 816 |
I would go with the 8-9, I've been through the full range with mine and LoCo is rite,, don't underestimate the Zetec. Go top speed one day, u'd be suprised at how well it handles.
"Wow, that sank fast." "Yeah, like a rock." 96 Contour GL ATX 9mm Ford Racing Wires; 2 Resonators down, 1 to go;"Special airbox"; many mods planned Sony CD player: 50wattsx4;remote; Speakers=50 watt Pioneer 6x8s Ross Evans
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 972
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 972 |
heh sorry, im used to my high 6s low 7s 0-60 :p
95 SE Champagne Mettalic True Dual exhaust with X pipe and Redline mufflers KKM Tru Rev intake H&R Springs/KYB struts Apex-i S-AFC 65mm Throttle Body 17" Ace Spades 4 Pt Racing Harness Window Tint all around New Engine @ 117k kilometers G-Tech: 15.6 @ 91.5 MPH
"you officially kick ass" quote from awed CEG'er after i chopped my hood and threw on scoops
RIP 98 SVT silverfrost *nov 4 2001*
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 60
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 60 |
no offense, but just call it slow. a naturally aspirtedI 4 is a dog. my ranger is a dog. 2.3L I 4. i hate it. now, my SVO isnt a dog. then again, it isnt NA. <---- wont settle for more than a 14.99 from his SVT contour.
1985 SVO: 4 cylinders, 5 gears, 20 PSI 1998 torredor red SVT contour: #3705 of 6535 need info on your SVTs service/recall/warranty history? e mail me...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,428
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,428 |
Originally posted by DonSVO: no offense, but just call it slow. a naturally aspirtedI 4 is a dog. my ranger is a dog. 2.3L I 4. i hate it. No offense but you don't know what you're talking about. An I-4 Ranger is a POS, of course you hate it! There are VERY powerful NA I-4s everywhere.. Granted, the 2.0 Zetec isn't one of them.. 
|
|
|
|
|