Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
#1530896 03/24/06 03:45 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 314
B
CEG\'er
OP Offline
CEG\'er
B
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 314
We can argue till we're blue in the face about what WAS spec'd, what IS spec'd, what cut the gears are, etc. etc.

But we have enough real world testing to know what works and what doesn't.

Ford didn't move away from the Mercon spec because transmissions were wearing out gradually. I bet we could still find manual Contours on the road right now with over 100k miles on them and original tranny's. People who just stick to what the service manual says. Probably people who drive gently. That shows that Mercon may not be the best choice, but it's an acceptable choice. If it wasn't at least "ok" they wouldn't have put it in from the factory.

I will certainly concede that a smooth shifting MTX75 with no mechanical issues will do better with Ford Honey. Should last longer, should shift well (maybe a tad thick when really cold, but reasonable). It's what Terry runs in his tranny's and what he recommends after a rebuild. A rebuild that includes a lot of UPDATED parts that are the keys to smooth easy shifts... UPDATED parts that most of us don't have.

There's a LOT of us driving around with original MTX75s that aren't perfect, that have slight fork issues, or synchro issues. We've got problems.
If people have the money, and want to have the perfect transmission, they're gonna have to drop some big bucks and get a rebuild.

But I bet a lot of people like myself want to protect the tranny as well as possible, and just keep driving. My tranny isn't great, but it's not bad either. Far from undrivable. Why not maximize my protection and driving enjoyment???

In my car, this means Royal Purple. It's cSt is thinner than Ford Honey so cold behavior is better. Yet it's synthetic so it protects better than any dino ATF. Add in the friction modifiers and it's the perfect choice for me. And I bet a few other people too.

In my case at least, if was to go back to Ford Honey, I bet I would need tranny work done SOONER than I will need it running Synchromax. Why? All those stiff shifts are hard on the forks and on the cables and the entire shift tower. Something could snap. I'd also be crunching and grinding the synchros into oblivion. Been there, tried it, no thanks.

And.. YES, If I ever have the thing rebuilt by TH I will definitely go with Ford Honey.

Brian
99 SVT
78k miles

#1530897 03/24/06 03:58 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
T
I have no life
Offline
I have no life
T
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
Originally posted by The1stAcekiller:
only after poor cold weather shifting did they switch to overpriced Honey..





Would you rather spend a couple $ on a quality fluid or 2k on a new transmission. It's a no brainer for me.


-'96 SE MTX 3L -'98 SVT 1,173 of 6,535 -'05 Mazda 6s, loaded, g/f's ride -Need a 96-00 manual on CD? PM or email me
#1530898 03/24/06 04:34 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 234
T
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
T
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 234
I agree that you SHOULD always go with the recommended Fluid.. but Ford Recommended Mercon and thats what came in from the factory.. and there are people here that had switched to Honey and there cold weather shifting was terrible.... so why would I want to spend all that money on fluid that is no better than cheap ATF in the cold??



98 Contour V6 MTX CTA Exhaust/CTA Intake/MSDS Y-pipe/Bat Handling Kit/Predator Alarm/Spec1 Clutch Kit/SVT Flywheel/G Assurances Fix your car yourself "It's not a UFO." Todras
#1530899 03/24/06 04:55 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
T
I have no life
Offline
I have no life
T
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
Originally posted by The1stAcekiller:
I agree that you SHOULD always go with the recommended Fluid.. but Ford Recommended Mercon and thats what came in from the factory.. and there are people here that had switched to Honey and there cold weather shifting was terrible.... so why would I want to spend all that money on fluid that is no better than cheap ATF in the cold??






And many have reported great results with Honey. Search through the archives. Some mentioned that it was better than the old Mobil 1 + FM cocktail which was pretty good.


-'96 SE MTX 3L -'98 SVT 1,173 of 6,535 -'05 Mazda 6s, loaded, g/f's ride -Need a 96-00 manual on CD? PM or email me
#1530900 03/24/06 10:24 PM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,065
M
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
M
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,065
Originally posted by The1stAcekiller:
I agree that you SHOULD always go with the recommended Fluid.. but Ford Recommended Mercon and thats what came in from the factory.. and there are people here that had switched to Honey and there cold weather shifting was terrible.... so why would I want to spend all that money on fluid that is no better than cheap ATF in the cold??






This guy above is the only person I have heard complain about the Ford Honey. My .02$


Born again on 04/09/06 FOR SALE: Moonroof glass and motor MB sunshade PM ME!
#1530901 03/25/06 01:06 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 234
T
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
T
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 234
I haven't tried Honey so I can't complain.. I'm just trying to find a good alternative to it.. and here is the original quote: (not mine)

"From my trials, I would rank them like this:
#1 Royal Purple (easy shifts, no crunching into second)
#2 ATF+3 (Quaker State dino) (shifted easily, occasionally crunched)
#3 Redline MTL (shifted easily enough but crunched too often while cold, even though I had added FM)
#4 Factory Fill (hard shifts, crunching when cold)
#5 Ford Honey (unbearable. to go into 1st, car had to be at a complete stop, then i had to double clutch. never did 1-2 in the first 10 minutes of driving, had to go to 3rd. )"


98 Contour V6 MTX CTA Exhaust/CTA Intake/MSDS Y-pipe/Bat Handling Kit/Predator Alarm/Spec1 Clutch Kit/SVT Flywheel/G Assurances Fix your car yourself "It's not a UFO." Todras
#1530902 03/27/06 04:13 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 468
A
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
A
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 468
I tried the Ford honey on my MTX-75, found it to be completely unbearable. May have been my clutch though - which was defective and is being replaced this week. will be topped up with Ford honey.

Currently I am using Quaker State dino ATF and it shifts great. But it was just a temporary means so that I would be able to get in gear when cold out.

I think my next ideal choice is some regulary changed (every 2-3 oil changes) Amsoil European Formula Synthetic 5w-40.


2005 Focus ST
#1530903 03/27/06 09:01 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,867
R
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
R
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,867
Originally posted by todras:
Originally posted by The1stAcekiller:

"What product do you recommend for manual transmissions / transfer cases that specify a Ford Mercon�® and / or GM Dexron�® fluid?

For manual transmissions and / or transfer cases specifying a Ford Mercon�® or GM Dexron�® type ATF, Royal Purple�® recommends either its Max ATF�® or for greater performance, its Synchromax�®."




Ford DOES NOT SPECIFY MERCON FOR THE MTX-75.




And Terry will disagree with me, but the only written guidance I've seen (the "infamous" TSB 00-1-9) "recommends" the honey for early MTX-75s, but "requires" the honey for cars built after 1 Jan 2000.

Of course, if you call the parts counter, their book (which is not really a "spec") will say "honey." Don't be confused. The honey is compatible with early MTXs, and can even be used to top off a Mercon-filled MTX, according to the TSB, so that's what the parts guy will sell you.

So in my mind the "spec" for cars built prior to 1 Jan 2000 has not changed.

That said, I don't mean to say anything about what you "should" use. In that I have to agree with Terry, but I'm running the RP anyway, at least at present.



Function before fashion. '96 Contour SE "Toss the Contour into a corner, and it's as easy to catch as a softball thrown by a preschooler." -Edmunds, 1998
#1530904 03/27/06 09:30 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
T
I have no life
Offline
I have no life
T
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
Please refer owners to the current Ford lube chart and not the transaxle are and the MTX75 info from 1995 to current date.

Chart is here.
http://www.fcsdchemicalsandlubricants.com/supplier/quickref/mantrans.pdf


-'96 SE MTX 3L -'98 SVT 1,173 of 6,535 -'05 Mazda 6s, loaded, g/f's ride -Need a 96-00 manual on CD? PM or email me
#1530905 03/27/06 09:38 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
R
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
R
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
is this damn pissing match ever going to stop? Or are we continue to read about who's penis works better?


Ryan Trollin!
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  RoadRunner_dup1, unisys12 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5