|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 41
New CEG\'er
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 41 |
can you use 3.0 liter cams in a 2.5 csvt? sorry if this is a stupid question? and if you can use them, is ther a big power gain?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,194
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,194 |
Originally posted by bnails: can you use 3.0 liter cams in a 2.5 csvt? sorry if this is a stupid question? and if you can use them, is ther a big power gain?
Yes, but the SVT cams are much more performance oriented than a normal Duractec camshaft.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 595
Veteran CEG\'er
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 595 |
The power isn't in the cams, it's in the extra .5 liters and, in the case of a 2001 and up 3 liter, the oval port heads flow nicely. More flow = More power and There's no replacement like displacement.
And yes, you can use them in your car and give me your svt cams! 
Black 1998.5
3L Oval Port
Full HMS Transmission
Lots of other stuff
Ressurected 06/14/06
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 41
New CEG\'er
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 41 |
thanx for the help, and i think that i will be keeping the svt cams.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,746
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,746 |
If you want more power and are consdering tearing the engine apart, check out the 3L forum. That's the best N/A thing you can do to get more power. Mix a 3l with an intake and full exhaust (headers-->back) and I'm sure you'll be pleased.
2000 Contour SVT
SF - #542 of 2150
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 41
New CEG\'er
|
OP
New CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 41 |
i would love to, but i just dont have the money for a project that big. for now i am just looking for cheeper upgrades at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,746
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,746 |
MSDS Headers, Optimize your Y-pipe, and a cat-back exhaust. And an open element filter for some growl.
2000 Contour SVT
SF - #542 of 2150
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
Actually the escape cams are a better cam choice than the stock 2.5L cams. They would fit if you use the updated chains and crank sprocket. I know because I ran them in my engine and they interchanged easily with my 2.5L SVT hardware. Great for a turbo too!
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 595
Veteran CEG\'er
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 595 |
Originally posted by warmonger: Actually the escape cams are a better cam choice than the stock 2.5L cams. They would fit if you use the updated chains and crank sprocket. I know because I ran them in my engine and they interchanged easily with my 2.5L SVT hardware. Great for a turbo too!
How about Escape cams vs. Taurus cams for naturally aspirated and FI, respectively?
Black 1998.5
3L Oval Port
Full HMS Transmission
Lots of other stuff
Ressurected 06/14/06
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
Not sure. I think under some years they had the same profile, esp. the later ones.
You can find this by searching the 3L forum. Procyon has posted lots of cam specs.
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
|
|