|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 225
CEG\'er
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 225 |
just an inquiry of opinion for a friend. if you had to choose between an 02 LS 3.0 manual and an 02 X-Type 3.0 manual what would it be and why?
thanks
99 csvt
68 cuda fastback 340
00 gp gtp (wife)
01 gs500
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
That's a hard choice. Both are nice vehicles.
I would probably have to side with the LS though. It seems to have a better chassis setup and less issues.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,066
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,066 |
The LS has the better setup (RWD)
But damned if the Jag is the looker of the two. I really wouldn't mind a 3.0 X-Type sport (blacked out chrome). Probably put on some lightweight wheels and the damn thing wouldn't be so slow I bet.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777 |
Jag 3L AWD 5 speed - whats not to love?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,423
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,423 |
Dispite my hate for AWD and underpowered vehicles, the X-type. I considered buying a new LS V6 5-speed in 2002, but the test drive greatly disappointed me. Way too heavy for the Duratec.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 225
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 225 |
demon- what issues are you refering to on the x-type?
99 csvt
68 cuda fastback 340
00 gp gtp (wife)
01 gs500
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220 |
Originally posted by cuda06:
demon- what issues are you refering to on the x-type?
Probably just the fact that it's a Jaguar. Not exactly a bulletproof car.
2003 Mazda6s 3.0L MTX
Webpage
2004 Mazda3s 2.3L ATX
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,193
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,193 |
The X-Type has suffered from much-worse-than-average reliability since inception.
That said, the LS is much more the driver's car in the way it drives and handles, even if the V8 is needed for power and you can't get a manual with it.
Brad "Diva": 2004 Mazda 6s 5-door, Volcanic Red
Rex: 1988 Mazda RX-7 Vert, Harbor Blue.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,725
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,725 |
for thesame money? the jag!
For Sale:
- Sony PSP with a Baseball 2k6 and the movie Crash. $100
- 1973 Karmann Ghia Convertible w/ Auto-Stick. Needs Restoration. $1200 OBO
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,020
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,020 |
I'd go for the LS. My dad has an '03 with the sport package with the 3.0 and auto  but it handles awesome. One of the best handling cars I've driven while still having a great ride. The V6 is a bit sluggish with the auto, but I bet the 5 speed would liven it up a bit. Make sure you get the sport package. Even with the V6 auto, I can steer the car during aggressive driving with the throttle pedal.(just dont let my dad know) 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
