|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,600
Addicted CEG\'er
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,600 |
Originally posted by Tour4reak:
on a dyno, would you see gains from a metal intake instead of that accordian tube?
im guessing they would be minimal enough to fall within the standard error of the dyno
#4559 of 6535 born on Feb 17, 1998
Black 1998.5 CSVT
FOR SALE [cleaning house]: SVT rear swaybar. Reasonable offer and its yours!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,155
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,155 |
I don't intend to break the facts, but my CAI hasn't sacrificed any low end for the gains it's given me. That could be because of the SVT TB though (in theory, balancing the loss out?)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,292
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,292 |
use this filter...that should help...btw anyone else ever use the ru 1785 before.. KKM VS K&N RU 1785 
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but STUPID lasts forever."-Aristophanes.
--93 pgt,headers,intake,borla=14.9 1/4mile
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
The RU-1785 is serious overkill for a NA engine.
You will not use the entire filter area effectively because it's size is so much greater then the engine's natural CFM pull.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7
Newbie
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7 |
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
The RU-1785 is serious overkill for a NA engine.
You will not use the entire filter area effectively because it's size is so much greater then the engine's natural CFM pull.
Demon,
Which filter would you recommend for a NA 3L with all the SVT goodies?
99 Cougar 3L Under Construction
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,155
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,155 |
RU 3530 seems to be perfect for our cars, but that's merely my opinion. I like the idea about the other suggested filter, too.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,709
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,709 |
Originally posted by Pre98:
I ran my car with half the stock box on after that happened so that cold air would be directed directly at the conical filter. It's the best thing you can do until you do get a CAI.
I tried to do this last night while using the polished intake tube and the filter wont fit into the lower stock airbox. The intake tube is longer than the accordian tube.
But its a great idea if you are using the standard accordian.
Originally posted by Chickens:
Religion can't do much for ashholes (unless you are an alterboy)
98.5 Se w/SVT mods
98 E0 SVT~ sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
