Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 273
C
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 273
to achieve the greatest channel separation what is best to use:
1) one four channel amp
2) two two channel amps
3) four one channel amps
4) two four channel amps bridged
5) four two channel amps bridged

remember all other issues like expense, space, setup time are considered unimportant

the issue here is channel separation not power output or impedance load ability.

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142
D
Moderator
Offline
Moderator
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142
1 four channel amp.

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142
D
Moderator
Offline
Moderator
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142
Quote:
1) one four channel amp
Cheap, effective.

Quote:
2) two two channel amps
Added expense for little to no improvement in performance.

Quote:
four one channel amps
Even pricier, takes up more space, requires more wire/wiring hardware, difficult to find a mono amp that is not class-D.

Quote:
two four channel amps bridged
No advantage over a single four channel amp.

Quote:
5) four two channel amps bridged
too much money, no advantage.

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 273
C
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 273
Dave what about the channel separation issue that I wanted to address by having multiple versus single amps?!?! :rolleyes:

Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142
D
Moderator
Offline
Moderator
D
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 8,142
It would not be noticeable, and what little difference may exist, isn't worth the money.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 491
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 491
Two 2 channel amps (one for front, one for rear) is more versitale than a single four channel amp setup. But only if the system was to be used for competition.
For street use, a single 4 channel amp is the best overall option.


1997 GL Sport MTX,
Soon to be the fastest proven Zetec around.
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,774
B
Moderator
Offline
Moderator
B
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,774
i concur. any overlap in the channels would not be noticable. you are more likely to pick up noise from other sources like wiring.


1998 E0 SVT #3128, T-Red

2001 Infiniti G20t
1974.5 MG B GT
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 273
C
Member
OP Offline
Member
C
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 273
Tell me bacoSVT and Sleeper have you guys ever bi-amped a component system? The pioneer Tsp-682 can be biamped I understand where a two channel amp would be used for the tweeter and a two channel amp would be used for the midbass driver. You know a tube amp for the high range and a mosfet amp for the midbass.

Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,774
B
Moderator
Offline
Moderator
B
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,774
if you see my post, i am thinking about the same thing. bi-amping the front stage. not sure what i'll do. my budget is about $300 to modify the whole system. it sounded pretty good in the GL, but i want it to be just a notch better in the SVT. wink


1998 E0 SVT #3128, T-Red

2001 Infiniti G20t
1974.5 MG B GT
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,032
S
Member
Offline
Member
S
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,032
Quote:
Originally posted by contour_phoenix_when:
Tell me bacoSVT and Sleeper have you guys ever bi-amped a component system? The pioneer Tsp-682 can be biamped I understand where a two channel amp would be used for the tweeter and a two channel amp would be used for the midbass driver. You know a tube amp for the high range and a mosfet amp for the midbass.
The TS-P682 is not set up to be bi-amped. You'll need a separate x-over (like the SS Exact 5.3) and a soldering iron to make the necessary modifications. wink


1999 SVT #900/2760
Born on 1-20-99
Silver Frost/Midnight Blue
A few aesthetic and audio mods

Moderated by  dnewma04_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5