|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
Hard-core CEG'er
|
OP
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025 |
oh ok! that was me then. The front bumper was in my garage. It wont make it up the trailer with the front bumper attached.
Jim Hahn
1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04
3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 208
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 208 |
Ive looked at a lot of dyno charts, and I think the assessment earlier about the cams is correct. You do not have enough cam in there, the svt cams would go a long ways towards fixing that. Still -- very nice setup, gonna be awesome with the additional boost, I can see record setting contour numbers for you.
00 SVT Contour: SHM LT headers, LSD, Spec Stg 3...dyno:190.3whp sold 02/04
04 Subaru Baja Turbo 5-spd
00 Camaro SS 393cid: 510rwhp/469rwtq, 11.16 @ 124.95(hit 1-2 limiter)
www.erikz.org
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 367
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 367 |
98.5 T-red SVTour
05 Blue Yamaha R6 for sale PM me
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 24
New CEG\'er
|
|
New CEG\'er
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 24 |
Thats one of the smoothest A/F curves ive ever seen. They did a real good job tuning. So have you driven the car on the street yet?
~jim
1997 GMC Sonoma 4.3 5 speed, 10psi Intercooled ATI Procharger, 3" Spintech exhaust, Went 13.6 at 105 mph.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
OP
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025 |
Not really. Ive been really busy studying for finals.
Jim Hahn
1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04
3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,974
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,974 |
Originally posted by beyondloadedSE:
Not really. Ive been really busy studying for finals.
TSK TSK you have got your priorities wrong  jsut kidding 
Aaron
AKA NVS SVT
98.5 Silver/Blue SVT#4553
Yeah it's modded
98 T-Red/Blue SVT Contour Totaled 06/05/06
03 3L,VCN 2000,CAT Cams,MSDS Headers w/Y-Pipe,XCal2 and lots more
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by BlownSonoma:
Thats one of the smoothest A/F curves ive ever seen. They did a real good job tuning. So have you driven the car on the street yet?
You're kidding right?
That's a full point of deviation. That's huge!
My A/F doesn't deviate more then 3 maybe 4 tenths and mine polls more than 10 times a second unlike the slow reading dyno widebands. If I drop the poll time to match a dyno's the deviation is about 2 tenths from 3000-7500rpm. (13.1 to 13.3)
Also the A/F is very rich right up to the end where it's only slightly rich. It should be around 12.2-12.5 and not 11.1 to 12.
Like I mentioned earlier that's some hidden power right there just waiting to be pulled out. Just what he needs, more power... 
Also the begs the question is it a properly placed wideband or a tail pipe sensor??? If it's a tail pipe unit then it is even richer then the graph states.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106 |
I wasn't there for the 3rd attempt at tuning, and come to think of it, neither was Jim. But I do know that the 2nd time, they did pull an O2 and did a true wideband. That could have been because he was running rich on the front bank and lean on the rear and wanted accurate readings. I'd guess they did the tailpipe as I recall them using that when we first showed up that 2nd trip.
Mark
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,859
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,859 |
I never did like the fact they use a tail pipe snifer. Its just kinda of flops around in the tail pipe, thats if they can get it in there right. When I asked them, they said they compared a 10k horriba meter to there snifer and received the same results. I'm not so convinced, but they do know more about that than I, Jerry is the king of Ford tuning after all, or so I hear. 
'99 Silver svt
For sale
19" Axis Neo wheels
3.0 parts, pre-98 trunk,
Check classifieds
bp.powell@comcast.net
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
A tail pipe mounted wideband O2 is not as accurate as one mounted right after the engine.
Too many variables introduced before the end of the piping.
For one. The fact if there is a catalytic converter on the car. If so that's a noticeable variable. (now a 4 gas sensor MUST be placed before any cats!)
Then there is the effect of temperature loss, stagnant air in the mufflers/resonators, et cetera. Albeit minor but more erratic variances.
Tail pipe is definitely better then nothing but it's results are not as accurate/consistent and normally reads a little leaner then it truly is.
Most "in ground dyno" shops likely use a tailpipe sniffer because of ease of use.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
