|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4
Newbie
|
OP
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4 |
Hi all, as my first post, I was wondering if someone could help me out.
I am trying to find pics of an H&R CSVT on stock rims.
Before I get reamed, I did search, but many of the archived pics are no longer there, and thus, those posts do me no good.
Thanks
Adrian
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,571
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,571 |
sorry man i went with a lower drop with intrax on mine
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,571
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,571 |
nice and clean csvt man but you get alot lower drop with intrax, they give the biggest drop for csvt's
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198 |
If I wanted schitty springs and a lower drop I would have gone with the Intrax. I'm still using the stock struts, and I put the springs on over 2 years ago.
P.S. These pictures were taken about a week after the springs were installed, so there may have been some settling still left.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,033
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,033 |
Originally posted by Buckeye(OH):
Hi all, as my first post, I was wondering if someone could help me out.
I am trying to find pics of an H&R CSVT on stock rims.
Before I get reamed, I did search, but many of the archived pics are no longer there, and thus, those posts do me no good.
Thanks
Adrian
If you liked the "raked look" where its slightly higher on the rear end, then deffinetly put H&R's on..If you want a sag in the back put Eibach's on. I have eibach's on mine right now, and I dont like the sag it leaves. I ordered H&R's about a week ago, shud be here soon. You can bet I'll be putting those on. 
Failure is simply the opportunity to begin again, this time more intelligently.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,872
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,872 |
Originally posted by ryanblacksvt:
sorry man i went with a lower drop with intrax on mine
how does that look cause I'm like not that far from buying them
#0009
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,779 |
that pic looks like ass, I hope they settled more in the rear... 
99 SVTC, T-Red, #652/2760-12.8.1998
Mother#@%@!* did I sound abstract?
I hope it sounded more confusin than that!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4
Newbie
|
|
OP
Newbie
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4 |
As was mentioned, it doesn't appear that the back was lowered much if at all. Would this be a correct assessment? Any updated pics?
Anyone happen to have pictures of a SVT on the B&G 2.25/1.6" springs?
The 4x4 look of my stocker is killin me!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 674
Veteran CEG\'er
|
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 674 |
Originally posted by Davo:
P.S. These pictures were taken about a week after the springs were installed, so there may have been some settling still left.
Yes they did settle alot more than what you see in the pic. I saw his SVT on Halloween and it is lower than that pic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
