|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899 |
Originally posted by SVTRUSH:
This is a riot! Two weeks go you were raving about how Bush had such a great LEAD. How all these polls meant something.
Now that Kerry wiped out Bush's lead, there crap.
Sounds like flip-flopping to me.
Quote:
Why do I get the impression that you'd have a totally different opinion about those polls if they showed John Flip-flop Kerry in the lead? Given that the polls are from Time and Newsweek, which are not exactly known for being Conservative leaning pubs, I'd say that they're believable.
From Sept 04. Regarding the double digit Bush lead.
Shut up, n00b. You did quite a flip flop yourself so I wouldn't be pointing any fingers.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 20
Banned
|
|
OP
Banned
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 20 |
Originally posted by PackRat:
Originally posted by SVTRUSH:
This is a riot! Two weeks go you were raving about how Bush had such a great LEAD. How all these polls meant something.
Now that Kerry wiped out Bush's lead, there crap.
Sounds like flip-flopping to me.
Quote:
Why do I get the impression that you'd have a totally different opinion about those polls if they showed John Flip-flop Kerry in the lead? Given that the polls are from Time and Newsweek, which are not exactly known for being Conservative leaning pubs, I'd say that they're believable.
From Sept 04. Regarding the double digit Bush lead.
Shut up, n00b. You did quite a flip flop yourself so I wouldn't be pointing any fingers.
Rules 3,5,6,7,8
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899 |
Originally posted by SVTRUSH:
Originally posted by PackRat:
Originally posted by SVTRUSH:
This is a riot! Two weeks go you were raving about how Bush had such a great LEAD. How all these polls meant something.
Now that Kerry wiped out Bush's lead, there crap.
Sounds like flip-flopping to me.
Quote:
Why do I get the impression that you'd have a totally different opinion about those polls if they showed John Flip-flop Kerry in the lead? Given that the polls are from Time and Newsweek, which are not exactly known for being Conservative leaning pubs, I'd say that they're believable.
From Sept 04. Regarding the double digit Bush lead.
Shut up, n00b. You did quite a flip flop yourself so I wouldn't be pointing any fingers.
Rules 3,5,6,7,8
What the hell are you talking about? 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 20
Banned
|
|
OP
Banned
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 20 |
Originally posted by PackRat:
Originally posted by SVTRUSH:
Originally posted by PackRat:
Originally posted by SVTRUSH:
This is a riot! Two weeks go you were raving about how Bush had such a great LEAD. How all these polls meant something.
Now that Kerry wiped out Bush's lead, there crap.
Sounds like flip-flopping to me.
Quote:
Why do I get the impression that you'd have a totally different opinion about those polls if they showed John Flip-flop Kerry in the lead? Given that the polls are from Time and Newsweek, which are not exactly known for being Conservative leaning pubs, I'd say that they're believable.
From Sept 04. Regarding the double digit Bush lead.
Shut up, n00b. You did quite a flip flop yourself so I wouldn't be pointing any fingers.
Rules 3,5,6,7,8
What the hell are you talking about?
Forum rules, that's why CI gets shut down.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,467
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,467 |
Originally posted by JEDsContour:
Bush stutters and frankly has problems speaking in public. We all know that. He is also the best choice to make the hard decisions to come. IQ is not everything - and that's for damn sure.
Could you please explain this one to me? How is he the
best choice?
Last edited by Antonio; 10/03/04 12:46 AM.
Now I hate America? That is a new one to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899 |
Lets review. Rule #3 Quote:
Posts containing vulgar, profane, abusive, racist or hateful language or expressions, epithets or slurs, text, photographs or illustrations in poor taste, inflammatory attacks of a personal, racial or religious nature will be deleted and actions may be taken against the originator. Attempts to defeat the built-in censor will be met harshly.
I don't believe I violated that rule.
Rule #5
Quote:
This is not a "free speech" site, so to speak, though you may say whatever you wish as long as it doesn't violate forum guidelines. The admins have final say on forum rules.
Hmm, I guess we'll have to wait for a ruling from a higher authority on this one. Freakshow?
Rule #6
Quote:
This is the internet -- don't be a wuss and get all bent out of shape if someone else doesn't agree with you. This is how flame wars start.
Oh my, could YOU be guilty of this too?
Rule #7
Quote:
If you have a problem with someone on the forums, please do not air it publicly. Take it off line via email, PM.s (personal message) or IM.
Hmmmm, don't think I violated this one either.
Rule #8
Quote:
Do not start or continue personal flaming. Posters initiating flaming will be met harshly, you have been warned.
Maybe I pushed the envelope on this one.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,341
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198 |
The collective boner of the leftists in this thread is amazing. The immediate effect of the debates is certain: Kerry appears more favorable, etc. But the long-lasting effects will only hurt Kerry. You can't "say anything" to gain style points, which Kerry did, and not expect the other side to call him on it. You'll see some excellent ads in the next few days from the RNC that will make Kerry and his followers wish the debate didn't happen.
Everyone pitching a "pants tent" really has no idea how elections work. Until you see Wisconsin, Iowa, and other blue states going back into the Kerry column, you should hold your wads. Then you have to think about taking Florida or Ohio.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 20
Banned
|
|
OP
Banned
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 20 |
Originally posted by Davo:
The collective boner of the leftists in this thread is amazing. The immediate effect of the debates is certain: Kerry appears more favorable, etc. But the long-lasting effects will only hurt Kerry. You can't "say anything" to gain style points, which Kerry did, and not expect the other side to call him on it. You'll see some excellent ads in the next few days from the RNC that will make Kerry and his followers wish the debate didn't happen.
Everyone pitching a "pants tent" really has no idea how elections work. Until you see Wisconsin, Iowa, and other blue states going back into the Kerry column, you should hold your wads. Then you have to think about taking Florida or Ohio.
You W. supporters don't get it. This issue is (was) Bush's strong issue. The hardest debate for Kerry by far, Kerry has won his hardest challenge the first debate.
Bush is going to have a very difficult task of swaying anyone, when they debate domestic policy. Bush canâ??t win on policy at home, because it does not exist. The â??No Child Left Behind actâ? , he quit funding it. All the environmental rules he has ruled back.
All these ads will be are more flip flop ads. This republican notion if your against the war, you don't support the troops is crap. They keep trying to pound this into people, and its not working.
Bush looked like a real idiot during this debate, rolling his eyes. The mumbling, asking for more time then saying nothing or repeating what he said 3 minutes earlier. Remember how is father played out in 92, when he checked his watch and gave the same impression W gave.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899 |
Originally posted by SVTRUSH:
Originally posted by Davo:
The collective boner of the leftists in this thread is amazing. The immediate effect of the debates is certain: Kerry appears more favorable, etc. But the long-lasting effects will only hurt Kerry. You can't "say anything" to gain style points, which Kerry did, and not expect the other side to call him on it. You'll see some excellent ads in the next few days from the RNC that will make Kerry and his followers wish the debate didn't happen.
Everyone pitching a "pants tent" really has no idea how elections work. Until you see Wisconsin, Iowa, and other blue states going back into the Kerry column, you should hold your wads. Then you have to think about taking Florida or Ohio.
You W. supporters don't get it. This issue is (was) Bush's strong issue. The hardest debate for Kerry by far, Kerry has won his hardest challenge the first debate.
Bush is going to have a very difficult task of swaying anyone, when they debate domestic policy. Bush canâ??t win on policy at home, because it does not exist. The â??No Child Left Behind actâ? , he quit funding it. All the environmental rules he has ruled back.
All these ads will be are more flip flop ads. This republican notion if your against the war, you don't support the troops is crap. They keep trying to pound this into people, and its not working.
Bush looked like a real idiot during this debate, rolling his eyes. The mumbling, asking for more time then saying nothing or repeating what he said 3 minutes earlier. Remember how is father played out in 92, when he checked his watch and gave the same impression W gave.
He said boner, are you going to report him to Lance too?
|
|
|
|
|
