Contour Enthusiasts Group Archives
Posted By: zaven 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 02:54 PM
Hi guys it been a while but im back my wife just got a 2000 mpv and i poped the hood to see a 2.5 in it well I used to own a 98 svt and sold it a while ago and have forgot some of the things i used to know about this engine. Will the oil in this van still need to be filled a half quart over on for those right hard turns what type of oil seems to be best for it and so on any info or little tricks will help!

Thanks guys
Posted By: jtour Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 02:59 PM
The best oil.....well alot of people use Mobil 1. I use quakerstate oil. As long as you change the oil and keep up with the maintenance you should be fine.

Posted By: Auto-X Fil Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 03:22 PM
I'm pretty sure that's a completely different engine. Mazda had a 2.5L they used in the 626 - it's probably that.
Posted By: AliasJerkâ?¢ Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 03:37 PM
Originally posted by Auto-X Fil:
I'm pretty sure that's a completely different engine. Mazda had a 2.5L they used in the 626 - it's probably that.




nope. Do you're research like I did




(2000 Mazda MPV) Specs:
2.5L 170 hp V6
Horsepower 170 @ 6250 RPM
Torque (lb-ft) 165 @ 4250 RPM
Valves/Valve Configuration 24/DOHC
Displacement (cc) 2540
Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.24 X 3.13
Compression Ratio 9.7:1
Fuel Type/System Gas/MPFI


(2000 Ford Contour V6) Specs:
2.5L 170 hp V6
Horsepower 170 @ 6250 RPM
Torque (lb-ft) 165 @ 4250 RPM
Valves/Valve Configuration 24/DOHC
Displacement (cc) 2540
Bore X Stroke (in.) 3.24 X 3.13
Compression Ratio 9.7:1
Fuel Type/System Gas/MPFI

100% identical. Only difference in the badge on the valve cover. All information taken from MSN Autos.
Posted By: Auto-X Fil Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 03:47 PM
Wow, very interesting! My mistake: Edmunds didn't have any pictures

I'm surprised that Mazda took an engine from their corporate partner instead of using the one they had already.

So, when are you going to do a 3.0L swap on the minivan?
Posted By: zaven Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 03:53 PM
Originally posted by Auto-X Fil:
Wow, very interesting! My mistake: Edmunds didn't have any pictures

I'm surprised that Mazda took an engine from their corporate partner instead of using the one they had already.

So, when are you going to do a 3.0L swap on the minivan?




I dont think ill be doing any swaps I was also very surprised to see that engine.IVe just forgot alot of what I used to know about this engine my time and mind have been taken up by my SRT-4 so do you guys think I sould still fill the oil alittle high on this one as well?
Posted By: Auto-X Fil Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 03:58 PM
Well, ASSuming that the heads are the same, then yes. The odds of being at high revs and high gees are almost zero in the MPV, but there's no harm in 6 qts or a little more - again, assuming it really is exactly identical, which is probably is.
Posted By: BOFH Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 04:04 PM
I am a former 2000 Mazda MPV owner. It is the Duratec engine. If you look at the plug wires, they are Ford. It even comes with a FL820S oil filter.

Some of the electronics are Mazda, but the block, heads and intake are Ford.

The US built Duratec engines were used because of some exchange rate issues that made this attractive. I suspect there was some excess capacity on the 2.5L engine line as the Contour and Mystique were not the radical sales success' that Ford had hoped for.

Later years, 2001 or 2002, I don't recall right now, they went to the 3L Duratec.

You might try mpvclub.org (or is it mpvclub.com) they have a pretty good owners forum over there.
Posted By: todras_dup1 Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 04:15 PM
You can also use one or both exhaust manifolds for extra breathing. Exhaust will have to be modified.
Posted By: bobmin Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 05:54 PM
Originally posted by BOFH:

The US built Duratec engines were used because of some exchange rate issues that made this attractive. I suspect there was some excess capacity on the 2.5L engine line as the Contour and Mystique were not the radical sales success' that Ford had hoped for.




As I remeber it, Ford pretty much crammed the Duratec down the throat of Mazda due to the excess capacity you mention. Mazda wasn't all that happy about it and the magazines pretty much panned the vehicle as the 2.5 did not have the torque to push the heavier MPV around.

Posted By: Jeb Hoge_dup1 Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 06:55 PM
Crammed is right. That engine bay makes the Contour's seem airy.
Posted By: zaven Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 07:08 PM
To tell the truth im pretty happy with the way it pulls the van around Its no race car but it dose ok I still hate getting in it after driving my SRT
Posted By: dsickles123456789_dup1 Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 07:13 PM
Originally posted by AliasJerk:
Originally posted by Auto-X Fil:
I'm pretty sure that's a completely different engine. Mazda had a 2.5L they used in the 626 - it's probably that.




nope. Do you're research like I did







go do your english homework, you make yourself look dumb.
Posted By: AliasJerkâ?¢ Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 07:21 PM
Originally posted by dsickles123456789:
Originally posted by AliasJerk:
Originally posted by Auto-X Fil:
I'm pretty sure that's a completely different engine. Mazda had a 2.5L they used in the 626 - it's probably that.




nope. Do your research like I did







go do your english homework, you make yourself look dumb.




What are you talking about?
Posted By: zaven Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 07:40 PM
Cant we just all get along!
Posted By: Ray_dup1 Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 08:04 PM
Originally posted by dsickles123456789:
Originally posted by AliasJerk:
Originally posted by Auto-X Fil:
I'm pretty sure that's a completely different engine. Mazda had a 2.5L they used in the 626 - it's probably that.




nope. Do you're research like I did







Go do your English homework. You make yourself look dumb.




Fixed.

The wording was left alone on purpose.
Posted By: Mod-deth Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/02/06 08:13 PM
Originally posted by todras:
You can also use one or both exhaust manifolds for extra breathing. Exhaust will have to be modified.




Eh?
Posted By: Big Daddy Kane Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/03/06 07:01 PM
Wasn't the MPV a rebadged Mercury Villager, or vice versa?

Heh... you could put a 3L in it!
Posted By: KyleH Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/03/06 07:12 PM
Originally posted by Big Daddy Kane:
Wasn't the MPV a rebadged Mercury Villager, or vice versa?

Heh... you could put a 3L in it!




No, that was the old Nissan Quest
Posted By: todras_dup1 Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/03/06 07:25 PM
Originally posted by Mod-Deth:
Originally posted by todras:
You can also use one or both exhaust manifolds for extra breathing. Exhaust will have to be modified.




Eh?




Just what I said. I know the front manifold fits fine. Can't remember if the rear does. They are a bette design than the Contour.
Posted By: Big Daddy Kane Re: 2000 mazda mpv - 03/03/06 07:33 PM
Originally posted by KyleH:
Originally posted by Big Daddy Kane:
Wasn't the MPV a rebadged Mercury Villager, or vice versa?

Heh... you could put a 3L in it!




No, that was the old Nissan Quest




Oh, DUH!

Brain fart, I remembered that my Voc Auto instructor had a 98ish Villager and was always talking about how it had some crazy Japanese V6 in it... like it had coilless ignition, but still had a distributor that was just a hall effect switch. Figured maybe they put the Duratec in for 2000, but I was thinking of a totally different platform!
© CEG Archives