• Welcome to the Contour Enthusiasts Group, the best resource for the Ford Contour and Mercury Mystique.

    You can register to join the community.

Ford's Executive Perks

todras

Pretty fly for a white guy *cowbell*
Joined
May 29, 2000
Messages
13,188
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
Cliff Notes: Fields' private jet costs between $50,000 - $70,000 a week to fly him to and from Florida for the weekends. I'm glad the money saved from those cut jobs is being well spent.

Investigators: High-Flying Perks
By Steve Wilson
November 14, 2006


Their companies may be flying through some very turbulent times and thousands of southeast Michigan workers are headed for a hard landing, but way up in the sky a number of auto industry CEO’s are still flying as high as ever.

Just so there’s no confusion: we’re talking about top executives using corporate jets for non-business purposes, trips that are purely personal—and costing troubled auto companies big money.

Couple that with the fact many of them have promised necessary sacrifices will be shared from bottom to top and here you’ve got what many are saying is the height of hypocrisy at companies where so many loyal workers and retirees alike are being hit hard.

At the troubled Ford Motor company where the blue-collar and salaried workforce alike is about to shrink by a third, the Way Forward is clear:
Mark Fields, Executive VP of Ford Motor Co, said in August, "We’re changing our culture to adopt a change or die mentality that is rejecting business as usual."

Ford’s Fields is widely credited with steering the company’s Mazda division on a more-successful course a few years back and now he’s the one charged with engineering the company-wide cuts, the plant closings, and the painful elimination of thousands of jobs.

Still, Ford’s top leadership insists, "We’ll do everything we can to ease the burdens." Those were the words of Ford Chairman William Clay Ford. "We all have to change and we all have to sacrifice but I believe this is the path to winning," Ford has said.

Industry experts like David Cole at the respected Center for Auto Research, and Ford employees alike, widely believe—or perhaps many just hope— that company chiefs are keeping their promises so, as Ford personally pledged, the burdens on families and communities can be eased as much as possible.

And so far, Mark Fields’ Way Forward has been a much steeper uphill drive than he planned. First, he said the company would be profitable again in two years, but now, he concedes it’ll be at least three—and far-deeper cuts are needed just to keep the company on the road.

In fairness, the road is much rockier than most expected, perhaps due mostly to circumstances beyond his control. So, last year, he still collected a million-dollar bonus—part of a pay package that totaled well over $3 million.

"In some cases you have ‘critical-skill people’ that the company can’t function without. That might be in tool making, could be a UAW employee," explains David Cole. We asked Cole whether he felt Mark Fields was among those employees. "Uh, I don’t think so," he said.
Fields has said, "We are making sacrifices at every level."

But there certainly doesn’t seem to be much sign of sacrifice at home - his home, in sunny South Florida, on the water in Delray Beach.
The same Ford executive who says he’s not looking for a free ride is getting exactly that virtually every weekend in a Ford corporate jet.
For weeks, we’ve been watching as he usually slips off every Friday afternoon to Ford’s hangar at Detroit Metro Airport and then climbs aboard one of six Ford jets that whisks him to a private airport near his Palm Beach County Florida home.

Fields is usually the only passenger—plus an aircraft crew of three—but on occasion, we’ve spotted his family riding along for free, too. Well, it’s free for the Fields’ but far from free to the floundering Ford Motor Company.

The 1,100 mile, 2-and-a-half hour, one-way trip from Detroit to Boca Raton in a Gulfstream-5? It’s not cheap at $7,000 an hour but then, add in the costs of the crew and their weekend meals and lodging expenses at what is said to be a luxury Palm Beach area hotel, and then of course the costs to fly Fields back to Detroit Sunday night... can it be $70,000 a week or more?—it certainly can when the jet makes two trips to Florida, one to drop him off and another to go back and pick him up?

A Ford insider claims he’s seen paperwork that says it’s $50,000 a week but it’s unclear what’s not included in that number.

Ford refuses to confirm or deny a figure, but it certainly could be the cost of one worker’s job every week Fields flies home.

David Cole notes, "You could argue that, but you have to realize that what Mark brings is a pretty unique quality to do this." "I want to put this into context," he says. "He led a turnaround at Mazda that was truly spectacular."

Now we should make it clear, these weekly commute flights to Florida are permitted by Mark Fields’ employment contract and today Ford issued a written statement that said, in part:

"Executive compensation at Ford is designed to attract, motivate and retain key leadership talent..."
But as workers are being asked to make contract concessions, why can’t top executives reaping millions simply pay for their own airline tickets?
 

JaTo

Hard-core CEG'er
Joined
Jul 13, 2000
Messages
3,005
Location
Armpit of Texas
"why can’t top executives reaping millions simply pay for their own airline tickets?"

Mmm, good question.

Security, convienence, speed, etc., etc.; I'm not saying that most execs do not tend to "abuse" some of their transportation priveliges a bit and the cost of ferrying them around in private jets at first glance looks to be quite expensive, but heads of multi-billion dollar companies that may need to take off at a moment's notice to address a major issue in person or close a multi-billion dollar deal should not have to deal with the whims of the airline industry in terms of a travel schedule.

Time is TONS money to many of these people and potentially sitting idle for hours in an airline terminal (even in Presiden'ts Clubs) where eveyone else under the sun can hear their conversations or potentially glance at what's happening on their laptop screen would be completely unacceptable if I was sitting on a board of directors and had to choose whether to plant the CEO on a commercial carrier or retain the use of a private jet.

They would foot some of the bill for "personal use", though, unless those personal trips are somehow putting $$$'s to the bottom-line...
 

TourDeForce

Hard-core CEG'er
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Messages
2,149
Location
West Palm Beach, FL
A perk is a perk. If it's in their contract that they get use of the company jet for business and personal travel, then so be it. Stop cryin'.

There should be some limitations on personal use, however. If I'm on vacation & the company calls me in for whatever issue, send the company jet. If I'm away for a company junket to Florida with other execs & their wives, then fire the bird up. If I'm just takin' the kids to Disney for the weekend, book a flight.
 
Last edited:

RT and his SE

CEG'er
Joined
Jan 7, 2001
Messages
93
Location
Apple Valley, MN. USA
How about reading the part of the article that says he's using it to commute home for the weekend.

If you want your workforce to believe in you and what you're trying to do maybe he should share some of the inconveniences that come with belt tightening.
At least he still has a job!
 

baco99

Hard-core CEG'er
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
2,221
Location
Boston, MA, USA
"why can’t top executives reaping millions simply pay for their own airline tickets?"

Mmm, good question.

i ask myself that question almost every day. my job is to squeeze every possible dollar and square inch out of every space plan i approve and build, but the CEO took in over $27 million last year.

go figure.
 

Fmr12B

Hard-core CEG'er
Joined
Jun 18, 2000
Messages
1,428
Location
San Jose, CA
Seems like Ford should maybe reduce exec perk since the lost over $5 billion in three months? Just my opine.

$50,000 *12weeks = $600,000 in additional expense.

When compared to $5billion the cost is really is just a drop in the ol bucket. Top executives who are turn-around pros command top dollar. If you think this guy is working 40hr weeks you all are nuts. The time he would spend clearing security and having limited usage of electronics while on a public flight would cost Ford more in the long run.
 

TourDeForce

Hard-core CEG'er
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Messages
2,149
Location
West Palm Beach, FL
How about reading the part of the article that says he's using it to commute home for the weekend.

If you want your workforce to believe in you and what you're trying to do maybe he should share some of the inconveniences that come with belt tightening.
At least he still has a job!

Screw that. If the contract OKs it, that's the way it is. WhoTH cares what perks the execs get? If the workforce doesn't like it, they can get their own education/contract and/or work somewhere else. Shooting down somebody elses perks is crybaby BS.

Sure, maybe he/she could have been more descrete about it, or at least temporarily started taking commercial airlines, but then would somebody have b******* that they were flyin' first class instead of coach?

Class envy BS I tell you!
 

MapOfTaziFoSho

Hard-core CEG'er
Joined
Aug 31, 2002
Messages
3,448
Location
The Mogadishu of the Midwest
Screw that. If the contract OKs it, that's the way it is. WhoTH cares what perks the execs get? If the workforce doesn't like it, they can get their own education/contract and/or work somewhere else. Shooting down somebody elses perks is crybaby BS.

Sure, maybe he/she could have been more descrete about it, or at least temporarily started taking commercial airlines, but then would somebody have b******* that they were flyin' first class instead of coach?

Class envy BS I tell you!

Class envy BS...wow! This is on the company dime! I would be pissed if I was a stockholder in that company! If he is on vacation and needs to be pulled out at moments notice then fine, put that on the company dime! This seems to be completely non-company related, and I completely disagree with your logic. He should be paying for his own flight to his vacation destination! :rolleyes:
 

TourDeForce

Hard-core CEG'er
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Messages
2,149
Location
West Palm Beach, FL
This seems to be completely non-company related, and I completely disagree with your logic. He should be paying for his own flight to his vacation destination! :rolleyes:

Nope. This is not his vacation spot. He has a home in Delray Beach near where I live. Last lines in the article:

"Now we should make it clear, these weekly commute flights to Florida are permitted by Mark Fields’ employment contract and today Ford issued a written statement that said, in part:

"Executive compensation at Ford is designed to attract, motivate and retain key leadership talent..."
But as workers are being asked to make contract concessions, why can’t top executives reaping millions simply pay for their own airline tickets?"

He is providing talent that Ford has utilized in the past & knows he can deliver on (Mazda), and Ford agreed to the pay, benefits, & incentive package. This is no business of labor & the share-holders should be happy to have him on board.
 
Last edited:

TGO

King of the OFT
Joined
Jun 29, 2000
Messages
10,034
Location
Staten Island NY USA
it probably costs more to fly dubya all over the place in air force one - that's what people should be compalining about since it comes directly out of our pockets.
 

MapOfTaziFoSho

Hard-core CEG'er
Joined
Aug 31, 2002
Messages
3,448
Location
The Mogadishu of the Midwest
Nope. This is not his vacation spot. He has a home in Delray Beach near where I live. Last lines in the article:

"Now we should make it clear, these weekly commute flights to Florida are permitted by Mark Fields’ employment contract and today Ford issued a written statement that said, in part:

"Executive compensation at Ford is designed to attract, motivate and retain key leadership talent..."
But as workers are being asked to make contract concessions, why can’t top executives reaping millions simply pay for their own airline tickets?"

He is providing talent that Ford has utilized in the past & knows he can deliver on (Mazda), and Ford agreed to the pay, benefits, & incentive package. This is no business of labor & the share-holders should be happy to have him on board.


Why can't he find a house in the metro Detroit area?! I know of many very nice areas where the rich and famous live. Ridiculous...I can't wait to see how Ford's PR people handle this one! :rolleyes:

There really is no excuse for him to be doing this! I am certain it could/would be overlooked if their financial situation wasn't so dire, but that is not the case!

It isn't class envy whatsoever, it is purely economical, and 'greed is good'
 

NO 4 EVR

CEG'er
Joined
Oct 15, 2003
Messages
457
Location
BGSU
I can't believe how some of you would defend him as if you were on the plane with him! You are missing the point, if the company is in so much trouble why would they allow him to do this EVERY weekend? His salary/bonus/perks are probably equal to that of a large portion of those salaries/perks/bonuses of those laid off!

Its funny how people defend rich people when they get money at the expense of others, but when a poor person gets welfare, people cry that is just wrong. And thats what it can be compared to. This is no different than an unemployed individual recieving welfare and then using that money to buy cars/clothes/drugs/bling when they should be saving money and being smart to pay more important things like bills.
 

TourDeForce

Hard-core CEG'er
Joined
Mar 4, 2003
Messages
2,149
Location
West Palm Beach, FL
I can't believe how some of you would defend him as if you were on the plane with him! You are missing the point, if the company is in so much trouble why would they allow him to do this EVERY weekend?

Because it was negociated in his contract. Nuttin' they can do about it. Ford is obligated to honor the contract. I agree that maybe he should cool it for a while; I agree that he could have gotten a place in Detroit; but when he took the job & he didn't want to commute in Detroit, and didn't want to move from his home in Florida, and has it written in his contract that Ford will foot the bill for his commute, then tough luck. He's entitled.

On principle you're right, but legally he gets a free ride.
 

JaTo

Hard-core CEG'er
Joined
Jul 13, 2000
Messages
3,005
Location
Armpit of Texas
Because it was negociated in his contract. Nuttin' they can do about it. Ford is obligated to honor the contract. I agree that maybe he should cool it for a while; I agree that he could have gotten a place in Detroit; but when he took the job & he didn't want to commute in Detroit, and didn't want to move from his home in Florida, and has it written in his contract that Ford will foot the bill for his commute, then tough luck. He's entitled.

On principle you're right, but legally he gets a free ride.

You have a point, as if some think ferrying him around in a private jet is expensive, think about the legal bills to engage upon litigation to get him to stop (which would be a losing proposition for Ford any way they cut it) or how much of a financial hit they would potentially take in renegociating his contract...

Some "personal discretion" in regard to his use of company assets in a time of financial trouble might go a long ways, but what do I know.
 
Last edited:

loggerbomb

Hard-core CEG'er
Joined
Jun 10, 2004
Messages
3,744
Location
Kitchener, ON Canada
I can't believe how some of you would defend him as if you were on the plane with him! You are missing the point, if the company is in so much trouble why would they allow him to do this EVERY weekend? His salary/bonus/perks are probably equal to that of a large portion of those salaries/perks/bonuses of those laid off!

Its funny how people defend rich people when they get money at the expense of others, but when a poor person gets welfare, people cry that is just wrong. And thats what it can be compared to. This is no different than an unemployed individual recieving welfare and then using that money to buy cars/clothes/drugs/bling when they should be saving money and being smart to pay more important things like bills.

Well I wouldnt say buying clothes or drugs is something you shouldnt do with unemployment monies - though I do think you mean illegal drugs when you say that, and I think you mean unessecary clothing. Myself, if I found myself on the unemployment line (which I have) Id invest some money in some new cothes for potential job interveiws - but only if I needed some nice new threads.
 
Top