Originally posted by Davo:You may not have been able to detect my sarcasm, but my point was even if they 'decided not to attack the bridge', a terrorist was captured. This would not have been possible without the Patriot Act. Even if the bridge wasn't saved, the Patriot Act is a valuable piece of legislation.
Your sarcasm wasn't particularly entertaining; on the other hand your witless attempt to prove your point with a link that proved the opposite - that was pretty humorous.
