Originally posted by Sandman333:
It seems we as a society recognize that our values are contrary to public nudity, and with the latest vote, we have seen a similar popular public opinion as to the question of gay marriage.




You are correct so far as you take it; however, the essence that is missing from your statement is the universal application.

Everybody is proscribed from public nudity. Should that change, then it should change for all. Universality would be maintained.

There is nothing discriminatory in a law that applies to everyone. There are thousands on the books, many, if not all, that reflect moral standards.

What you are in essence suggesting is that to allow same sex marriages would the same as invalidating any law that had its basis in commonly held morality.

Again, with respect,that does not follow.