Originally posted by Marky:

---

If you get close to the 14's be sure and post the slip.

---

and a video

--------------------
99 SE V6\5spd - 156 HP\157 TQ 15.166-90.84
Totaled 02/12/06

99 SVT # 1571 - 175 HP\153 TQ 14.999-91.88
Born 3/24/99 Reborn 3/18/06
Pietenpol Racing Technologies project vehicle

90 Festiva L 5spd, Blue(not for long), 103k

Post Extras:

Originally posted by pole120:

---

Originally posted by Marky:

---

If you get close to the 14's be sure and post the slip.

---

and a video

---

--------------------
1998 SVT
2.5" exhaust to 2.25" duals, homemade intake, 94A poly RRR, B&G Autobahn Series Springs

Post Extras:

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

guys what did your svts run stock? mine went low 15.40s.
ps
whats wrong with bosch plus 4s?

---

they may be lighter or the same weight as your stockers, but the rotational mass is moved further out, which takes more power to make it move...??? or something like that...also your contact patch is prob wider....and the plugs r garbage

--------------------
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but STUPID lasts forever."-Aristophanes.
--93 pgt,headers,intake,borla=14.9 1/4mile



Post Extras:

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

guys what did your svts run stock? mine went low 15.40s.
ps
whats wrong with bosch plus 4s?

---

misfires....amongst other problems

Our cars DON"T like Bosch products... period. Unless its a cabin filter. I think the plugs have something to do with not being able to gap them properly because of their crappy design. Duratecs are picky about plug gap, wire, etc.

SVT stock is a high 15.3 (I think) with a GOOD driver.

--------------------
2006 Pontiac G6 3900SFI GTP Coupe
CAI, Stainless Cat Back, Vector Tune, Strut Brace, Eibach Pro Kit, Custom Made Projector Headlights, 4300K, 20% Tint

Former Owner- 2000 "Stryped" CSVT
CEG Dragon Run- Oct 13-15


Post Extras:

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

i disagree about the plugs. rotational mass moved out. i guess that makes sense. since there is more wheel and less tire,but hey im happy with the performance now. i expected 14s after the flywheel replacement.but i would have to assume y-pipe w/o cat should knock off a tenth. when your dealing with @200 horse it doesnt take much. roughly 10 horse = one tenth.

---

???

Wow... where'd you educate yourself from?!

1) Bosch plugs are PROVEN to be BAD for our 2.5L Duratec
2) 200 horses? Nope... to the ground 160-175 depending on driver/conditions
3)Y-pipe w/o a cat... won't do anything on yoru time. Intake? If your car can't suck in more air.. it can't technically release it any faster.

--------------------
2006 Pontiac G6 3900SFI GTP Coupe
CAI, Stainless Cat Back, Vector Tune, Strut Brace, Eibach Pro Kit, Custom Made Projector Headlights, 4300K, 20% Tint

Former Owner- 2000 "Stryped" CSVT
CEG Dragon Run- Oct 13-15


Post Extras:

Originally posted by tour96se:

---

i think it has been proven that having no cat or a gutted cat with high flow y pipe isnt as effective as having a working cat...???

---

From what I have read.

--------------------
2006 Pontiac G6 3900SFI GTP Coupe
CAI, Stainless Cat Back, Vector Tune, Strut Brace, Eibach Pro Kit, Custom Made Projector Headlights, 4300K, 20% Tint

Former Owner- 2000 "Stryped" CSVT
CEG Dragon Run- Oct 13-15


Post Extras:

Originally posted by LilStrypedSVT:

---

1) Bosch plugs are PROVEN to be BAD for our 2.5L Duratec
I agree, but I'm sure he wants specifics as to WHY they are "bad".
2) 200 horses? Nope... to the ground 160-175 depending on driver/conditions
I doubt he meant FWHP. I would assume he is talking at the crank.
3)Y-pipe w/o a cat... won't do anything on yoru time. Intake? If your car can't suck in more air.. it can't technically release it any faster.

---

A highflow y-pipe w/ or w/out a cat should still improve power throughout all rpms. And technically, if the exhaust is a huge restriction(as the y-pipe IS with our cars), then it CAN release it faster without any form of "intake".

Mark

--------------------
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq


Post Extras:

Originally posted by Y2KSVT:

---

Originally posted by LilStrypedSVT:

---

1) Bosch plugs are PROVEN to be BAD for our 2.5L Duratec
I agree, but I'm sure he wants specifics as to WHY they are "bad".
2) 200 horses? Nope... to the ground 160-175 depending on driver/conditions
I doubt he meant FWHP. I would assume he is talking at the crank.
3)Y-pipe w/o a cat... won't do anything on yoru time. Intake? If your car can't suck in more air.. it can't technically release it any faster.

---

A highflow y-pipe w/ or w/out a cat should still improve power throughout all rpms. And technically, if the exhaust is a huge restriction(as the y-pipe IS with our cars), then it CAN release it faster without any form of "intake".

Mark

---

Ahhh.. right. Thats where an Intake will not benefit unless exhaust is combined.

--------------------
2006 Pontiac G6 3900SFI GTP Coupe
CAI, Stainless Cat Back, Vector Tune, Strut Brace, Eibach Pro Kit, Custom Made Projector Headlights, 4300K, 20% Tint

Former Owner- 2000 "Stryped" CSVT
CEG Dragon Run- Oct 13-15


Post Extras:

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

I just cant get this car to launch good w/ my Neo Gen Nittos.

---

Now I can see why you can't get your 60's down... I've never been fond of those tires, for multiple reasons.


Ray

--------------------
'99 CSVT - Silver #222/276
In a constant state of blow-off euphoria.

Originally posted by Kremitthefrog:

---

I like to wear dresses and use binoculars to watch grandmas across the street.

---

Post Extras:

Originally posted by DemonSVT:

---

15 flat with a 2.55 60' from basically a stock SVT.

Not going to happen!!!

---

my thoughts exactly

--------------------
99 SE V6\5spd - 156 HP\157 TQ 15.166-90.84
Totaled 02/12/06

99 SVT # 1571 - 175 HP\153 TQ 14.999-91.88
Born 3/24/99 Reborn 3/18/06
Pietenpol Racing Technologies project vehicle

90 Festiva L 5spd, Blue(not for long), 103k

Post Extras:

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

I guess im in that .9% of great drivers

---

that can defy the laws of physics...


or so they will say.








and BTW, if Demon says your time is fishy, he's usually right, and don't argue.

--------------------
87 Mustang GT 5.0L TURBO


Post Extras:

Originally posted by tour96se:

---

so basically you have a aftermarket y pipe to make the car quicker...

---

That's what I've gathered from his mod list. The part I don't get is where he says that cutting the factor airbox is better than a heatshield and an open filter. The MAF screen isn't going to net an HP, 18" wheels(more than likely heavier than the stock 16"s and tires) are going to slow him down. And with a 2.55 60' time, he'd be hard pressed to break 16's!

By the way, what was your mph?

Mark

--------------------
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq


Post Extras:

Originally posted by tour96se:

---

so basically you have a aftermarket y pipe to make the car quicker...

---

--------------------
Ryan
Trollin!


Post Extras:

Originally posted by Kremitthefrog:

---

I like to wear dresses and use binoculars to watch grandmas across the street.

---

Post Extras:

Originally posted by Stylin55_oh:

---

Yeah i have no idea how he says he's running a 15.08 .. I've got a basically stock (hp wise) SVT and i'll be happy if its under 16 at all. Granted shes got 130,000mi. But still, a full second is a HUGE difference.

---

Don't stock 95 SE's hit 15.9 or seomthing like that?

--------------------
95 SE MTX
svt exhaust
intake
deer killer

Post Extras:

Originally posted by elraido:

---

Don't stock 95 SE's hit 15.9 or seomthing like that?

---

NOT with a 2.5-2.6 60' time. That's the point.

The 1/4 mile time he is stated would be excellent for any SVT.
It's just not going to happen with such a horrible launch and 1-2 shift.

A 2.55 verses a 2.25 60' time will be nearly .5 seconds slower at the end of the 1/4 mile. So that's like stating a near stock SVT would run low 14's with a 2.1-2.2 60' time. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!

--------------------
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!

It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.

Post Extras:

Originally posted by DemonSVT:

---

Stock is 15.3ish with perfect everything.

Normal is 15.5ish

Traps around 90mph.

---

so if thats stock why wouldnt you believe with my mods i could chop 2.5 tenths???

--------------------
99 SVT "nice"
14.67 @ 92.6 mph (street trim)

FOR SALE
contact KEVIN.BOX@CINGULAR.COM
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/1592122

Post Extras:

Originally posted by Y2KSVT:

---

Originally posted by tour96se:

---

so basically you have a aftermarket y pipe to make the car quicker...

---

That's what I've gathered from his mod list. The part I don't get is where he says that cutting the factor airbox is better than a heatshield and an open filter. The MAF screen isn't going to net an HP, 18" wheels(more than likely heavier than the stock 16"s and tires) are going to slow him down. And with a 2.55 60' time, he'd be hard pressed to break 16's!

By the way, what was your mph?

Mark

---

i also have a fidanza flywheel.
the factory air box is shaped like a cone around the filter. it has a small hole at the end which is connected to the little elbow which runs into the fender(99 svt). what i did is put in a k+n cone style filter and took out the screen(had to do some fabbing to make the factory adapter fit snug against the maf)then i cut in a circle about 5 inches of the black plastic housing that surounds the filter off this gives it more air and sheilds it from heat.
total cost = $45 filter/labor=free /cut finger=free

this set-up will be for sale if anyone wants it as soon as i recieve my cc cold air intake.

--------------------
99 SVT "nice"
14.67 @ 92.6 mph (street trim)

FOR SALE
contact KEVIN.BOX@CINGULAR.COM
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/1592122

Post Extras:

Originally posted by Kremitthefrog:

---

I like to wear dresses and use binoculars to watch grandmas across the street.

---

Post Extras:

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

the factory air box is shaped like a cone around the filter. it has a small hole at the end which is connected to the little elbow which runs into the fender(99 svt). what i did is put in a k+n cone style filter and took out the screen(had to do some fabbing to make the factory adapter fit snug against the maf)then i cut in a circle about 5 inches of the black plastic housing that surounds the filter off this gives it more air and sheilds it from heat.
total cost = $45 filter/labor=free /cut finger=free

this set-up will be for sale if anyone wants it as soon as i recieve my cc cold air intake.

---

I know exactly what you're talking about. I've had my SVT since it was brand spankin' new. First off, you're going to want to remove that little elbow in your intake, it's a pretty big restriction of airflow! What "CAI" are you going to be running? Is it the GMK unit?

Mark

--------------------
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq


Post Extras:

Originally posted by Y2KSVT:

---

You obviously haven't paid any attention when drag racing, or you have a rigged track that gives people false hope! An 89mph trap with a 2.55 60' time would be around a 16.0-16.2! For you to run a 15.0 with the 60' time you had, you'd need to trap closer to ~96mph.

------------------------"WRONG"

As for launching, good luck with your differential. With 3500rpm launches and reving to 5000rpms, you're sure to be either clutchless of diffless.

------------------------"MAYBE"

For an optimum launch, I rev to about 2800rpms. At the line I'll let the clutch pedal out until it's almost about to grab. Once ready(when I get the green), I start to slip the clutch and rev the motor to keep the rpms at about 2800-3100rpms. Once you've got a little momentum and you've completely let out on the clutch pedal, you'll be right at the point of your secondaries opening and your powerband begins. After that you're on your own.

Mark

---

------------------"YOU RUN ? W/ 3.0L???"


--------------------
99 SVT "nice"
14.67 @ 92.6 mph (street trim)

FOR SALE
contact KEVIN.BOX@CINGULAR.COM
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/1592122

Post Extras:

Originally posted by Y2KSVT:

---

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

the factory air box is shaped like a cone around the filter. it has a small hole at the end which is connected to the little elbow which runs into the fender(99 svt). what i did is put in a k+n cone style filter and took out the screen(had to do some fabbing to make the factory adapter fit snug against the maf)then i cut in a circle about 5 inches of the black plastic housing that surounds the filter off this gives it more air and sheilds it from heat.
total cost = $45 filter/labor=free /cut finger=free

this set-up will be for sale if anyone wants it as soon as i recieve my cc cold air intake.

---

I know exactly what you're talking about. I've had my SVT since it was brand spankin' new. First off, you're going to want to remove that little elbow in your intake, it's a pretty big restriction of airflow! What "CAI" are you going to be running? Is it the GMK unit?

Mark

---

what elbow? the thing that used to go into the fender? its been awhile since that mod, i dont remember an elbow.
custom cougars cold air is the one.

--------------------
99 SVT "nice"
14.67 @ 92.6 mph (street trim)

FOR SALE
contact KEVIN.BOX@CINGULAR.COM
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/1592122

Post Extras:

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

the factory air box is shaped like a cone around the filter. it has a small hole at the end which is connected to the little elbow which runs into the fender

---

Originally posted by Y2KSVT:

---

I know exactly what you're talking about. I've had my SVT since it was brand spankin' new. First off, you're going to want to remove that little elbow in your intake, it's a pretty big restriction of airflow! What "CAI" are you going to be running? Is it the GMK unit?

Mark

---

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

what elbow?

---

Are you serious?

Mark



--------------------
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq


Post Extras:

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

Originally posted by Y2KSVT:

---

You obviously haven't paid any attention when drag racing, or you have a rigged track that gives people false hope! An 89mph trap with a 2.55 60' time would be around a 16.0-16.2! For you to run a 15.0 with the 60' time you had, you'd need to trap closer to ~96mph.

------------------------"WRONG"

---

---

No... that was right.. a trap of 95-96 would be REQUIRED to pull off a 15.0x with a 2.5x 60'.. plain and simple.

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

Originally posted by Y2KSVT:

---

As for launching, good luck with your differential. With 3500rpm launches and reving to 5000rpms, you're sure to be either clutchless of diffless.

------------------------"MAYBE"

---

---

not a maybe.. your differential is SCREAMING at you to take it easy.


Ray

--------------------
'99 CSVT - Silver #222/276
In a constant state of blow-off euphoria.

Originally posted by Kremitthefrog:

---

I like to wear dresses and use binoculars to watch grandmas across the street.

---

Post Extras:

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

Originally posted by Y2KSVT:

---

1: You obviously haven't paid any attention when drag racing, or you have a rigged track that gives people false hope! An 89mph trap with a 2.55 60' time would be around a 16.0-16.2! For you to run a 15.0 with the 60' time you had, you'd need to trap closer to ~96mph.

------------------------"WRONG"

2: As for launching, good luck with your differential. With 3500rpm launches and reving to 5000rpms, you're sure to be either clutchless of diffless.

------------------------"MAYBE"

For an optimum launch, I rev to about 2800rpms. At the line I'll let the clutch pedal out until it's almost about to grab. Once ready(when I get the green), I start to slip the clutch and rev the motor to keep the rpms at about 2800-3100rpms. Once you've got a little momentum and you've completely let out on the clutch pedal, you'll be right at the point of your secondaries opening and your powerband begins. After that you're on your own.

Mark

---

3: ------------------"YOU RUN ? W/ 3.0L???"

---

1: Bold statement you've made there. First off, YES you are WRONG! You will NOT run a 15.0 with a 2.55 60' time. I now see that you've changed your mind on what you ran, and conveniently changed your 60' time to a 2.25. When you want to come back with your timeslip, we'll talk.

2: Maybe? You're not talking to a newbie that's never broken a part on his car! You're talking to someone that frequents the dragstrip probably 10-12 times a year, blown a motor, 2 trannies, etc.. I know what it takes to break parts!

3: I ran a 14.4 with my 3.0L. Can't wait to hear what you've got to say about that!

Again, when you want to come back with FACTS, and not made up BULLSH!T, we'll talk. Until then, STFU!

Mark

--------------------
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq


Post Extras:

Originally posted by Y2KSVT:

---

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

the factory air box is shaped like a cone around the filter. it has a small hole at the end which is connected to the little elbow which runs into the fender

---

Originally posted by Y2KSVT:

---

I know exactly what you're talking about. I've had my SVT since it was brand spankin' new. First off, you're going to want to remove that little elbow in your intake, it's a pretty big restriction of airflow! What "CAI" are you going to be running? Is it the GMK unit?

Mark

---

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

what elbow?

---

Are you serious?

Mark

---

i thought it was self explanitory that that piece was gone. what purpose would it serve if the filter housing wasnt conected to it anymore??



--------------------
99 SVT "nice"
14.67 @ 92.6 mph (street trim)

FOR SALE
contact KEVIN.BOX@CINGULAR.COM
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/1592122

Post Extras:

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

TourdeForce sent me an email as to why exactly those plugs arent good. It made sense and I wont buy them again, but I just put them in about 500 miles ago. If I start to notice a problem Ill change them out for some Autolites, as he suggested.
Im about 45 minutes from Norwalk Raceway. You?

---

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

Hey Mmarfan,
what was done to your SE? thats almost exactly what my car runs.(or ran, last time)

---

I'm more toward the Cincy area, so I'm much further away.

The SE had:
APEXi SAFC
SVT upper and lower honed and port matched
2.5 inch exhaust split to 2.25
short ram "cold" air intake
65mm throttle body (which is for sale if anyone wants it, it includes a TPS with it)
15 inch stock alloy SE style wheels.
Eibach springs/ Koni struts

--------------------
Mazda 6S, V6, Speed Yellow
5 Speed, Sport package
Bose audio
Painted 'stash and HIDs!
w/Injen 1/4 14.750 @ 94.94

Former car:
99 Contour SE Sport Black MTX V6
SVT plastic...
1/4 - 15.012 @ 90.58

Post Extras:

Originally posted by warmonger:

---

Nice stuff on that website. You say that is your dad? Cool. Is he ever going to do anything with front drive vehicles?

---

yes, he does all types of cars, and bikes. he did a head for an srt neon just last week. he will do tour heads as well. well do mine, but im going to wait till the motor breaks before i pull them off.(the motor WILL break)

--------------------
99 SVT "nice"
14.67 @ 92.6 mph (street trim)

FOR SALE
contact KEVIN.BOX@CINGULAR.COM
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/1592122

Post Extras:

Originally posted by elraido:

---

Originally posted by Stylin55_oh:

---

Yeah i have no idea how he says he's running a 15.08 .. I've got a basically stock (hp wise) SVT and i'll be happy if its under 16 at all. Granted shes got 130,000mi. But still, a full second is a HUGE difference.

---

Don't stock 95 SE's hit 15.9 or seomthing like that?

---

No! They pull a 15.5 with a 2.5 60' Remember?

Post Extras:

Originally posted by 98ford2L:

---

Originally posted by elraido:

---

Originally posted by Stylin55_oh:

---

Yeah i have no idea how he says he's running a 15.08 .. I've got a basically stock (hp wise) SVT and i'll be happy if its under 16 at all. Granted shes got 130,000mi. But still, a full second is a HUGE difference.

---

Don't stock 95 SE's hit 15.9 or seomthing like that?

---

No! They pull a 15.5 with a 2.5 60' Remember?

---

I already said it was a typo on my part. 2.25 not 2.5
"JEALOUSY IS A WASTED EMOTION"




--------------------
99 SVT "nice"
14.67 @ 92.6 mph (street trim)

FOR SALE
contact KEVIN.BOX@CINGULAR.COM
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/1592122

Post Extras:

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

Originally posted by 98ford2L:

---

Originally posted by elraido:

---

Originally posted by Stylin55_oh:

---

Yeah i have no idea how he says he's running a 15.08 .. I've got a basically stock (hp wise) SVT and i'll be happy if its under 16 at all. Granted shes got 130,000mi. But still, a full second is a HUGE difference.

---

Don't stock 95 SE's hit 15.9 or seomthing like that?

---

No! They pull a 15.5 with a 2.5 60' Remember?

---

I already said it was a typo on my part. 2.25 not 2.5
"JEALOUSY IS A WASTED EMOTION"

---

I wasn't actully insulting you, I was reffering to a kid who was one here a few weeks ago talking about how his 95se could pull a 15.5 with a 2.5 60'

So anyway back to you, nice times. And if people are jumping on you it's probably because they have experience, and comments like this don't help, even if you are a really good driver it just doesn't go over real well

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

I guess im in that .9% of great drivers

---

Post Extras:

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

Y2KSVT i spose your being a condesending with your question about the tps but ill entertain it.
optimized TPS meaning stock it read .92 volts. i changed it to .98 just like i do to all the mustangs ive owned. not much but it helps.
im sure you know this, but to others reading this dont set it over .99 volts

---

You are kidding right?

This mod does nothing.

The PCM uses the TPS reading based on the percentage of TPS deviation from it's static (or starting/idle/base) reading.

That static reading could be .75v or .99v and 60% TPS is still 60% TPS.

Changing the static position of the TPS does nothing.


For instance: In the stock code +60% from static indicates you have reached WOT. Regardless of what "static" is to begin with.

If static is 15% then 75% indicates WOT.
If static is 20% then 80% indicates WOT.


--------------------
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!

It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.

Post Extras:

Originally posted by DemonSVT:

---

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

Y2KSVT i spose your being a condesending with your question about the tps but ill entertain it.
optimized TPS meaning stock it read .92 volts. i changed it to .98 just like i do to all the mustangs ive owned. not much but it helps.
im sure you know this, but to others reading this dont set it over .99 volts

---

You are kidding right?

This mod does nothing.

The PCM uses the TPS reading based on the percentage of TPS deviation from it's static (or starting/idle/base) reading.

That static reading could be .75v or .99v and 60% TPS is still 60% TPS.

Changing the static position of the TPS does nothing.


For instance: In the stock code +60% from static indicates you have reached WOT. Regardless of what "static" is to begin with.

If static is 15% then 75% indicates WOT.
If static is 20% then 80% indicates WOT.

---

OUCH!!

Mark

--------------------
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq


Post Extras:

Originally posted by Y2KSVT:

---

Are the Custom Cougars and GMK intake the same thing? I'd take your car as late as you can for racing. Obviously, the cooler the air the better for this time of year.

Mark

---

They are very similar,but the cc is cheaper and I think it looks nicer.




--------------------
99 SVT "nice"
14.67 @ 92.6 mph (street trim)

FOR SALE
contact KEVIN.BOX@CINGULAR.COM
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/1592122

Post Extras:

Originally posted by Kremitthefrog:

---

I like to wear dresses and use binoculars to watch grandmas across the street.

---

Post Extras:

Originally posted by Ray:

---

Wait.. so.. because you were able to move your vehicle 60 FEET FASTER, you think you are going SLOWER at the end?


Ray

---

let me reitterate, if a car makes two passes on the same day with the same mods. one run it goes 15.00 at 90 mph with a 2.3 60 ft(spinning not bogging). The next run it goes 14.8 at 88 with a 2.1 60 ft. the mph went down because the car has less time to gain speed. get it ?

--------------------
99 SVT "nice"
14.67 @ 92.6 mph (street trim)

FOR SALE
contact KEVIN.BOX@CINGULAR.COM
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/1592122

Post Extras:

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

Originally posted by Ray:

---

Wait.. so.. because you were able to move your vehicle 60 FEET FASTER, you think you are going SLOWER at the end?


Ray

---

let me reitterate, if a car makes two passes on the same day with the same mods. one run it goes 15.00 at 90 mph with a 2.3 60 ft(spinning not bogging). The next run it goes 14.8 at 88 with a 2.1 60 ft. the mph went down because the car has less time to gain speed. get it ?

---

I'm not experienced in drag racing, but that just doesn't seem to make sense.

Post Extras:

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

iac not egr my bad. that makes sense but the temp sensor is to small in diameter to fit in adapter hole. i guess ill make it fit.

---

...thats better...everything lined up when we did bills..as far as the iat just you some silicone..

--------------------
"Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but STUPID lasts forever."-Aristophanes.
--93 pgt,headers,intake,borla=14.9 1/4mile



Post Extras:

Originally posted by 98ford2L:

---

Originally posted by racerbox77:

---

Originally posted by Ray:

---

Wait.. so.. because you were able to move your vehicle 60 FEET FASTER, you think you are going SLOWER at the end?


Ray

---

let me reitterate, if a car makes two passes on the same day with the same mods. one run it goes 15.00 at 90 mph with a 2.3 60 ft(spinning not bogging). The next run it goes 14.8 at 88 with a 2.1 60 ft. the mph went down because the car has less time to gain speed. get it ?

---

I'm not experienced in drag racing, but that just doesn't seem to make sense.

---

well thats reality. if you dont believe me ask a veteran drag racer, hell ask Don Garlits.

--------------------
99 SVT "nice"
14.67 @ 92.6 mph (street trim)

FOR SALE
contact KEVIN.BOX@CINGULAR.COM
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/1592122

Post Extras: