Contour Enthusiasts Group CEG

Modifications >> Brakes

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | (show all)
RaraAdministrator
"Absolut Rara."

Reged: 09/09/00
Posts: 3223
Loc: Westland, MI
Re: 300mm Front Rotors & 280mm Rear Rotors new
#1187744 (Re: Rara) 03/09/06 11:41 AM

btw, calcs using some assumed numbers for piston sizes show the difference between the 278mm and 300mm rotors on the rear worth about 1.2% on rear bias. Compared to ~1.8% difference for a minor change in friction on the rear.

I'll throw out some actual #'s when I can dig up those piston sizes.

--------------------
Balance is the Key.

rarasvt@comcast.net

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Y2KSVT
Addicted CEG'er

Reged: 09/30/02
Posts: 6106
Loc: Fort Wayne, IN
Re: 300mm Front Rotors & 280mm Rear Rotors new
#1187784 (Re: Rara) 03/09/06 12:25 PM

Originally posted by Rara:
However, my gut feeling says the 300/280 combo will be a little more rear biased than stock




Even with the smaller pads in the rear? Definitely not questioning your expertise, but more or less trying to get an understanding of what you're saying, exactly.

Mark

--------------------
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
RaraAdministrator
"Absolut Rara."

Reged: 09/09/00
Posts: 3223
Loc: Westland, MI
Re: 300mm Front Rotors & 280mm Rear Rotors new
#1187797 (Re: Y2KSVT) 03/09/06 12:33 PM

Originally posted by Y2KSVT:
Originally posted by Rara:
However, my gut feeling says the 300/280 combo will be a little more rear biased than stock




Even with the smaller pads in the rear? Definitely not questioning your expertise, but more or less trying to get an understanding of what you're saying, exactly.

Mark




Rear pad size doesn't change. Besides, pad size (within reason) really doesn't have a lot to do with overall brake torque, in fact increasing pad size down toward the center of the rotor (much like how the FSVT pad is larger than the later CSVT pad) will very slightly DECREASE brake torque due to the decrease in effective radius (eff. radius is the distance from the center of the rotor to the radial center of the pad)

Using my assumed piston sizes, my suspicions played out as accurate, but only barely.

--------------------
Balance is the Key.

rarasvt@comcast.net

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Ray
Addicted CEG'er

Reged: 07/10/01
Posts: 7100
Loc: San Antonio/Austin, TX
Re: 300mm Front Rotors & 280mm Rear Rotors new
#1187963 (Re: Steeda.) 03/09/06 03:31 PM

Originally posted by SteedaSVT™:
LOL USAF vs ARMY vs Marines in the same thread! LOL Whos in the Navy?




Right here, you bunch of weenies. Stay on the shore where you belong.

(PS. I am out of the branch match-off now.. just wanted to throw that in there.)


--------------------
'99 CSVT - Silver #222/276
In a constant state of blow-off euphoria.
Originally posted by Kremitthefrog:
I like to wear dresses and use binoculars to watch grandmas across the street.




Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
RTStabler51
Hard-core CEG'er

Reged: 10/13/00
Posts: 6760
Loc: On the short bus
Re: 300mm Front Rotors & 280mm Rear Rotors new
#1187975 (Re: Ray) 03/09/06 03:52 PM

Originally posted by Ray:
Originally posted by SteedaSVT™:
LOL USAF vs ARMY vs Marines in the same thread! LOL Whos in the Navy?




Right here, you bunch of weenies. Stay on the shore where you belong.

(PS. I am out of the branch match-off now.. just wanted to throw that in there.)



Just like a squid to hit and run.

--------------------
Ryan
Trollin!


Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
RaraAdministrator
"Absolut Rara."

Reged: 09/09/00
Posts: 3223
Loc: Westland, MI
Re: 300mm Front Rotors & 280mm Rear Rotors new
#1187994 (Re: RTStabler51) 03/09/06 04:25 PM

Go argue somewhere else, keep this thread on topic.

--------------------
Balance is the Key.

rarasvt@comcast.net

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
warmonger
Hard-core CEG'er

Reged: 08/16/01
Posts: 5810
Loc: Ozark, AL
Re: 300mm Front Rotors & 280mm Rear Rotors new
#1188067 (Re: Steeda.) 03/09/06 07:04 PM

Originally posted by SteedaSVT™:
Originally posted by RTStabler51:
Originally posted by warmonger:
Originally posted by SteedaSVT™:
Originally posted by RTStabler51:
Originally posted by SteedaSVT™:
i just want it in the rear and Stazi knows that.


wow.




Sorry Ryan you where already taken by one of your Marine buddies,




LMAO ROFL on both these comments. Tears...
My wife came over to find out what was wrong with me.


then she saw the beret on your head




LOL USAF vs ARMY vs Marines in the same thread! LOL Whos in the Navy?




I'm sure theres a squid around somewhere....hiding in the deep ready to pop their head up and chime in.
(Like 20000 leagues under the sea)



--------------------
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
warmonger
Hard-core CEG'er

Reged: 08/16/01
Posts: 5810
Loc: Ozark, AL
Re: 300mm Front Rotors & 280mm Rear Rotors new
#1188069 (Re: Rara) 03/09/06 07:07 PM

Originally posted by Rara:
btw, calcs using some assumed numbers for piston sizes show the difference between the 278mm and 300mm rotors on the rear worth about 1.2% on rear bias. Compared to ~1.8% difference for a minor change in friction on the rear.

I'll throw out some actual #'s when I can dig up those piston sizes.




I calculated about 1% difference, I suppose that isn't much different than what you got, but I wonder why we have different numbers??

Either way, I did the calcs and then with actual testing found out I liked it VERY much with FSVT Rotors/pads on the front and with bendix Ti on the rear. Very good feel when braking hard and I even had the bad luck to do real life panic stop on them once where I was limited by the road surface and traction and the ABS kicked in.
Otherwise, with the bigger rubber I had on the car I finally had awesome brakes.


--------------------
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
RaraAdministrator
"Absolut Rara."

Reged: 09/09/00
Posts: 3223
Loc: Westland, MI
Re: 300mm Front Rotors & 280mm Rear Rotors new
#1188103 (Re: warmonger) 03/09/06 08:29 PM

Tom, what piston sizes did you use for front and rear?

--------------------
Balance is the Key.

rarasvt@comcast.net

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
warmonger
Hard-core CEG'er

Reged: 08/16/01
Posts: 5810
Loc: Ozark, AL
Re: 300mm Front Rotors & 280mm Rear Rotors new
#1188274 (Re: Rara) 03/10/06 06:15 AM

Never mind, I used the CSVT front and Rear sizes with Tod's (TCE) calculators to see what the effect of just rotor sizing would be if the pad compound was constant. Probably too simplified eh?

So it wasn't using FSVT pistons because I was designing it for CSVT calipers all the way around.


--------------------
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black

Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | (show all)


Extra information
0 registered and 9 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Andy W. 

Print Thread

Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled

Thread views: 4509

Jump to

Contact Us Contour.org

*
UBB.threads™ 6.2.3

Generated in 0.082 seconds in which 0.062 seconds were spent on a total of 13 queries. Zlib compression enabled.

Copyright 1999-2005 Lance Kinley

CEG and contour.org are not affiliated with nor endorsed by Ford Motor Company