GTO Pete
(Hard-core CEG'er)
12/19/05 07:10 PM
Re: 2006 CEG Calendars

To answer some questions / points raised:

Originally posted by skrilla187:
Looks great. I take it my pic was grainy maybe.



skrilla: Unfortunately, your resolution was way too low.

Originally posted by pole120:
Was there something wrong with my high-res?



Keep in mind that if you were asked for high resolution shots does not mean you made it in. There were about 15 voters who voted on about 50 pictures.

Originally posted by frenchblueC2:
lookin great guys
It's too bad about the picture quality issue. I had a lot of favorites that didn't make it, but the turnout is still very nice!



I agree and I feel badly for those indivduals. It's unfortunate, but now everyone knows that 1800x1350 is the minimum resolution.

Originally posted by RawBurt:
The good: The calendar really does look great. I love the design and text used.



Credit Mike for this - he had total control of layout and deign.

Originally posted by RawBurt:
The bad: There are alot of repeat cars from earlier years.



So what if there are repeats? So we should eliminate them even though they had the highest votes simply because they were in previous years? Can't help it that the voters find those cars/pics to be the best.

Originally posted by RawBurt:
Also some lame backgrounds.... for example, driveways.



There is one month with a driveway shot.

=Feedback on your submissions=
I have received a couple PMs politely asking why they didn't make the cut / what they can do to improve.

I will be more than happy to provide feedback to you regarding your submissions! Just shoot me a PM!!



Contact Us Contour.org

*
UBB.threads™ 6.2.3

Generated in 0.002 seconds in which 0 seconds were spent on a total of 4 queries. Zlib compression enabled.

Copyright 1999-2005 Lance Kinley

CEG and contour.org are not affiliated with nor endorsed by Ford Motor Company