+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: 4.0 L Contour ?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    CO Springs, CO.
    Posts
    874

    Default 4.0 L Contour ?

    So, I was reading in Car&Driver about the new 2007 models. The new 3.5 L 265hp engine that Ford is putting in most of its cars, is the same size as the old 3.0L. They also stated that they were working on a 4.0L that would also be the same size as the 3.0L with 300hp. Just thought it would be sweet to have a SVT Contour with a 4.0 L. You have to read Car&Driver, because I dont know how they could make a 4.0L fit in the same size 3.0L block. Thought it was interesting. -B.
    1998 SVT With a few mod's #970 SOLD 95' Trans Am SC 500hp RWD "silverbullet" SOLD 88' 323 GTX 200HP AWD Super Sleeper SOLD, 94' Honda Civic Hatch 415WHP SOLD
    93' VR4 300HP SOLD, 92' Infinty G20 145hp of Fury, 02' Merc-Benz SLK AMG 350HP

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Fort Wayne, IN
    Posts
    6,700

    Default

    But much like the 3.5L discussions, the 4.0L will have (IIRC) VVT, which will not be plug and play like the current 3.0L swaps.

    Mark
    2004 Mazda 6

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Louisville, Ky
    Posts
    9,565

    Default

    Still would be sweet though. Id love to swap that in a Contour, make it rwd, and turbo/spray the thing. The cost would be rediculous but its nice to dream.
    Jim Hahn
    1999 Tropic Green SVT Contour
    1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04 Sold
    3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
    364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    CO Springs, CO.
    Posts
    874

    Default I C

    Ok, so not plug and play, but still a cool thought. A 4.0L with 300hp and no FI would be a front wheel drive M3 on crack ! I might come back to the CSVT world when a 4.0L can be had for cheap, and someone with the know how to put it in. Selling a car is HORRIBLE right now ! Im down to $4500, with not even a call. Wait and see, might just have to keep it. -B
    1998 SVT With a few mod's #970 SOLD 95' Trans Am SC 500hp RWD "silverbullet" SOLD 88' 323 GTX 200HP AWD Super Sleeper SOLD, 94' Honda Civic Hatch 415WHP SOLD
    93' VR4 300HP SOLD, 92' Infinty G20 145hp of Fury, 02' Merc-Benz SLK AMG 350HP

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    4,506

    Default

    300hp+FWD+our cars=Stupid Wheelspin and not a lot of fun.
    99 TRed Contour SVT # 1853 out of 2760 - SOLD
    230.2 WHP @ 6500
    237.0 WTR @ 2250
    99 Tropic Green SVT
    96 Mystic Cobra: Procharged and Intercooled. Needs a new BOV

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tourige View Post
    300hp+FWD+our cars=Stupid Wheelspin and not a lot of fun.
    that sounds like hella fun
    94 Towncar RIP 20090730
    96 SE mtx, parts car
    99 Cougar, project car
    09 Fit mtx, DD

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bensenvill View Post
    that sounds like hella fun
    LOL, it sounds fun to me if you can turn it on and off...like a boost controller. 300 HP N/A is not usually that unliveable like 300HP on a turbo which can come much more suddenly.
    My project website
    MazdaSpeed3...Cosmic Blue Mica
    I am no longer part of Nautilus Performance Group.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    1,944

    Default

    I can't recall all the discussion in the 3.5L thread... but if VVT is the primary issue, IF the 3.0L heads are physically compatible, would it then be possible? Hmm... am I also remembering correctly that the 3.5L was going to be only mated to ATX's, which was another potential issue?

    From pics of 3.0L blocks, it doesn't look like the bore can be much larger... so if they're just stroking the 3.0L for the 3.5/4.0L's, then that might make it even more feasible.
    morbid
    2000 Contour SVT (black)
    #61 (Sept 17, 1999)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Westland, MI
    Posts
    5,365

    Default

    morbid,

    Anything is possible, it just takes money and time.

    The 3.5L Duratec is an all new engine compared to the 3.0L, it simply occupies the same package space. The block is different, so the 3.5L to 4.0L jump would certainly be covered at least partly by a bore increase. And the heads are most certainly different. Though, once you have all the VVT hardware in the car, it then is just a wiring and calibration issue; niether of which is insurmountable.

    There is currently no manual trans designed to mate up to the D35, but I'm sure an adapter plate could be designed to put most any manual trans behind it; the question is, whether the resulting combo would fit in a contour . . . (the D35 crank sits lower than the "old" duratec)
    Balance is the Key.

    rarasvt@comcast.net

  10. Default

    Since this is coming in cars with the 3.0 now are they also changing transmissions or keeping the same one that was used before? Transmission issues may not be any worse than they are now.
    Sadly the beater now- Green 2000 SVT #1166
    http://www.geocities.com/savinoss/cars.html
    2007 CTS-V - 2005 CRV needs more power

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts