Short Ram

[Mywhip]

Anyone ever actually bought one of these? http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1995...Q5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories#ht_1668wt_1044

I was looking into getting a short ram kit, and found this..just looks too good to be true.

Not performance, but i saw this to :
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Xeno...Q5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories#ht_1788wt_1044

Would it be alright on my 96 stock headlights?

 

[striker2]

thats for the V6, not the Zetec. :troutslap:

 

[Mywhip]

I saw that to, but what would be the difference if you ran it for the 4 cylinder?

 

[Tex]

I saw that to, but what would be the difference if you ran it for the 4 cylinder?

Ummm. Have you seen a zetec intake compared to a Duratec one? They are completely different.

 

[Mywhip]

No, i haven't.

Sorry for this thread then >.>

 

[zorrex]

You want something more like this:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/00-0...ptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories

Search "focus intake" on ebay.

 

[xtascox]

I highly recommend the SleeperZ intake. It works awesomely and doesn't make the car sound ricey at all. I'm still not 100% finished because I haven't made the pipe that goes into the fender yet but with everything else done, it is a very noticeable difference.

Here's the How To:
http://contour.org/ceg-vb/showthread.php?t=64

 

[Con-Man]

Zetec Air Intake

Zetec Air Intake

I like this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Air-...c0.m245&_trkparms=65:12|39:1|72:1171|240:1318

 

[zorrex]

Waste of money.

 

[icysvt]

Waste of money.

care to elaborate on that?

 

[2000SE]

care to elaborate on that?

Why spend 90 dollars for the same thing you can spend 20 dollars for? :shrug:

 

[icysvt]

Why spend 90 dollars for the same thing you can spend 20 dollars for? :shrug:

you OBVIOUSLY didnt look too closely at both of those. They AREN'T the same:nonono:

 

[2000SE]

you OBVIOUSLY didnt look too closely at both of those. They AREN'T the same:nonono:

Exactly. I saw 90 dollars and chose to ignore a waste of money.

 

[Mywhip]

you OBVIOUSLY didnt look too closely at both of those. They AREN'T the same:nonono:

they both perform the same function. one is just nicer looking >.>

 

[2000SE]

they both perform the same function. one is just nicer looking >.>

Thank you kind sir.

 

[mystiquevltwin]

I highly recommend the SleeperZ intake. It works awesomely and doesn't make the car sound ricey at all. I'm still not 100% finished because I haven't made the pipe that goes into the fender yet but with everything else done, it is a very noticeable difference.

Here's the How To:
http://contour.org/ceg-vb/showthread.php?t=64

I second this. With the SleeperZ, you aren't drawing all the hot air from the engine bay like all the others posted. It sounds great, and draws the air from the fender. Just take out the inner-fender resonator, and you will have a gnarly intake.

 

[Mywhip]

couldn't i just put a cone filter where the box filter use to be?

and how much is the sleeperz altogether?

 

[zorrex]

couldn't i just put a cone filter where the box filter use to be?

and how much is the sleeperz altogether?

Waste to just throw a cone filter where the box was! The box pulls air from the fender. You would also need to delete the accordion tube and the stupid resonator that goes forward over the coil pack towards the battery to make it worthwhile. I left the plenum on top of the TB but many people have been known to toss an elbow fitting on it. I haven't tried both so I'm not sure which one is better. :shrug:

 

[xtascox]

couldn't i just put a cone filter where the box filter use to be?

and how much is the sleeperz altogether?

Because hot engine bay air creates less power than cool air from the fender:shrug:

 

[jrichardson]

i designed this intake which deletes the stock airbox all together.

http://i1118.photobucket.com/albums/k606/jacob_richardson1/Car/100_0629.jpg?t=1300803607
http://i1118.photobucket.com/albums/k606/jacob_richardson1/Car/100_0628.jpg?t=1300803607